Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 65 (0.88 seconds)
Documents citing Kartar Singh vs Union Of India & Others on 6 November, 2012

The State Of Haryana And Others vs Chandi Ram And Another on 20 November, 2012

In view of the fact that both the parties are ad idem that the controversy involved in the present appeal is squarely LPA No.1774 of 2011 (O&M) -3- covered by the decision rendered in the case of Kartar Singh (Supra), present appeal is, thus, allowed, in terms of the aforesaid order and the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge is hereby set aside.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R K Jain - Full Document

Gurmeet Singh Baggri And Ors vs Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. And ... on 4 July, 2023

[8]. The High Court of Orissa however took a different view in Writ Petition No.3848 of 2010 titled Rabi Sankar Patro Vs. Orissa 5 of 27 ::: Downloaded on - 07-07-2023 22:55:20 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084678 CWP No.6704 of 2021(O&M) 2023:PHHC:084678 6 Lift Irrigation Corporation Ltd. Two Sets of appeals were preferred before the Hon'ble Apex Court i.e. one from Kartar Singh's case (supra) and second from Rabi Sankar Patro's case (supra).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - R M Singh - Full Document

Manohar Prasad Saha vs The Institution Of Engineers India & Ors on 26 July, 2016

In the case at hand, this Court has already found that the respondent No.1 being established by Royal Charter which has the force of law, it is a statutory body as held by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Kartar Singh (supra). Thus, the writ petition against the respondent No.1 is maintainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Chattisgarh High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 1 - P K Mishra - Full Document

State Of Haryana And Another vs Gurmail Kaur And Ors on 22 March, 2021

Respondents filed CWP No. 7626-2015 wherein the question for consideration before this Court was whether the authorities can withhold the appointments letters by taking the aid of the judgment in Kartar Singh vs. Union of India and others, 2013 (1) RSJ 224, despite there being an interim order of Hon'ble the Supreme Court dated 14.12.2012 in SLP (Civil) No. 35793-35796 of 2012, whereby the aforementioned judgment has been 1 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 26-08-2021 04:56:52 ::: LPA No. 171 of 2021 2 challenged. Vide judgment dated 27.05.2015, this Court allowed the writ petitions and directed the respondents to issue appointment letters to the candidates by putting a condition in the same manner, as has been put while issuing appointment letters to the candidates, who have challenged the exemption clause vis-a-vis sitting in HTET/STET examination forthwith. The respondents were further directed to issue re-appointment letters to the petitioners, whose services have been dispensed with by putting the same condition.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Harjinder Pal Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 16 December, 2021

The writ petitioners had raised challenge to the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) held on 30.01.2018, in pursuance of the recommendations made on 14.12.2017 for consideration for promotion to 1 of 4 ::: Downloaded on - 17-12-2021 21:25:07 ::: CM-1424-LPA-2021 in/and LPA No.780 of 2018 -2- the posts of Sub-Divisional Engineers (SDE). The candidature of Junior Engineers/Assistant Engineers, Civil and Mechanical having been considered under the AMIE quota and having been obtained from IME, Mumbai, was the subject matter of dispute, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court passed in 'Kartar Singh Vs. Union of India and others' 2012 (4) SCT 741.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 Next