Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 19 (0.98 seconds)
Documents citing Kundan Lal Vij vs Delhi Administration And Ors. on 6 August, 1970

Subhash Chander Chhabra vs Food Corporation Of India And Ors. on 4 September, 1995

(20) A single Judge of this Court in case of Kundan Lal Vs. Delhi Administration, 1976(1) S.L.R. 133(9) after noticing various judicial decisions on the subject, preferred to follow the middle view to the effect that when there is a substantial acquittal of the accused of criminal charge, there should not be a departmental proceedings against him in respect of the same charge on same facts unless there are present conditions like the acquittal being on technical ground or establishing the conduct which would make it. unworthy of the said officer continued in office.
Delhi High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - J B Goel - Full Document

Shri Arun Prasada vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 25 January, 2005

2. Cases are common-place where it has been contended that once an employee has been acquitted in a criminal case, disciplinary proceedings on the same subject should be dropped forthwith. The view in Kundan Lal v. The Delhi Administration, Delhi and Ors., 1976(1) SLR 133 where Departmental Proceedings had been quashed consequent upon the acquittal of the delinquent employee has not been ubiquitously followed.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - V Sen - Full Document

Danvir Verma vs Punjab National Bank on 18 January, 2005

2. The Petitioner has been acquitted of offences under Sections 420, 471/34 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code in terms of the Judgment of the Metropolitan Magistrate announced on 05.08.1995. The Respondent had also instituted a suit for the recovery of Rs. 93,325/- which has also been dismissed since the Civil Judge was of the view that the Defendant/Respondent Bank had failed to discharge the burden of proof in respect of Issues which prima facie appear to be similar to those in the Departmental/Disciplnary Inquiry. Even in the face of these two judicial pronouncements, covering the criminal culpability as well as civil liability of the Petitioner, the Inquiry Officer, who is a Zonal Manager of the Respondent Bank, has returned the finding that the petitioner had failed to discharge his duties with utmost integrity, devotion and diligence, that he failed to protect the interests of the Bank; had acted in a manner unbecoming of an officer of the Bank; and had acted in a manner prejudicial to the inteest of the Bank, in his Report dated 24.09.2002. What will have to be determined at the relevant time is whether these charges differ in material content from the scope of the criminal and civil litigation. Kundan Lal v. The Delhi Administration, Delhi and Ors., 1976 (1) SLR 133, was a decision rendered by a Learned Single Judge of this Court in which it had been prayed that the disciplinary proceedings against the Petitioner should be dropped since he had been acquitted by the criminal court in respect of a corrupt practice which was the subject matter of the Charge-sheet also. The prayer was granted. Justice Rangarajan extracted and applied the extracted conclusions condensed in Shaik Kasim Versus The Superintendent of Post Offices, Chinglept Dn. And Anr. , where again it was found that the facts/evidence and charges in both proceedings were the same; and the acquittal was `substantially on merit' connoting the contradistinction with grant of benefit of doubt:
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 3 - V Sen - Full Document
1   2 Next