Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.46 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Haryana And Another vs R.K. Verma And Others on 31 October, 2012

Balbir Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 21 November, 2019

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that case of the petitioners is covered by judgments passed by this Court in CWP-8082- 2001, titled as "R.K.Verma and others Vs. State of Haryana and another" decided on 01.12.2010 (Annexure P-1), LPA-951-2012, titled as "State of Haryana and another Vs. R.K.Verma and others" decided on 31.10.2012 (Annexure P-2) and CWP-4429-2014, titled as "Nafe Chand and others Vs. State of Haryana and others" decided on 10.03.2014 (Annexure P-3). Further, he states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 22-12-2019 16:54:33 ::: CWP No. 33921 of 2019 2 a direction is issued to respondent No.1-Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, Department of School Education, Haryana Civil Secretariat, Chandigarh to consider and decide the legal notice dated 20.08.2019 (Annexure P-6) in the light of judgments attached as Annexures P-1, P-2 and P-3.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

The Haryana State Cooperative Supply & ... vs Jai Pal Singh on 19 March, 2013

3. The outcome of the issue would depend upon the question as to whether it was an anomaly which sought to be removed by granting the selection grade or it was the benefit given for the first time. The principle of law is well settled in this behalf by series of judgments of the Supreme Court which were taken note of by this Division Bench in Letters Patent Appeal No. 951 of 2012 decided on 31.10.2012 titled as State of Haryana and another Vs. R.K.Verma and others. The position was summed up in the following manner:-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Pal Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 30 August, 2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per detailed judgmenmt (Annexure P-7) the issue in the present case is squarely covered in favour of present case and direction has been given the respondents to grant revised pay scale w.e.f. 01.01.1996. He has further referred to the DB judgment passed in the case of State of Haryana and another vs. R.K.Verma passed in LPA No.951 of 2012 (Annexure P-3) wherein, the judgment of the learned single Bench has been upheld and LPA has been dismissed. Petitioner has submitted his legal notice dated 11.08.2018 (Annexure P-10) 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 03-10-2018 06:49:42 ::: CWP No.21895 of 2018 2 for removing his anomaly but no action has been taken in this regard.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R Bahri - Full Document

Ishwar Singh Pilania And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 1 October, 2018

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that case of the petitioners is covered by judgments passed by this Court in CWP-8082- 2001, titled as "R.K.Verma and others Vs. State of Haryana and another" decided on 01.12.2010 (Annexure P-2), LPA-951-2012, titled as "State of Haryana and another Vs. R.K.Verma and others" decided on 31.10.2012 (Annexure P-3) and CWP-4429-2014, titled as "Nafe Chand and others Vs. State of Haryana and others" decided on 10.03.2014 (Annexure P-4). Further, he states that at this stage he would be satisfied, if a direction is issued to respondent No.1-Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Haryana, Department of School Education, Haryana Civil 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 13-10-2018 23:16:02 ::: CWP-21693-2018 -2- Secretariat, Chandigarh to consider and decide the legal notice dated 13.04.2018 (Annexure P-10) in the light of Annexures P-2, P-3 and P-4.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - J Chauhan - Full Document
1