Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.31 seconds)

Shiv Lal vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors on 14 August, 2019

This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan& Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra). However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises." He further submits that petitioners are on similar footings to that of Smt. Pinki Devi as she has already been extended the benefit of grant of appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari in pursuance to the directions issued by this Court.
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - V K Mathur - Full Document

Smt. Asha W/O Shri Bachchan Dhol vs The State Of Rajasthan on 21 August, 2019

8. This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with (Downloaded on 06/06/2021 at 06:03:55 PM) (5 of 5) [CW-593/2019] these directions as well as in consonance with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra).
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Hullas Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 October, 2021

8. This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance (Downloaded on 23/10/2021 at 10:00:55 PM) (5 of 5) [CW-14817/2021] with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra)."
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Vijay Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 23 October, 2021

8. This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance (Downloaded on 23/10/2021 at 10:01:36 PM) (5 of 5) [CW-14850/2021] with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra)."
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Sumitra Devi vs State Of Rajasthan on 26 October, 2021

8. This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance (Downloaded on 26/10/2021 at 09:43:57 PM) (5 of 5) [CW-15000/2021] with the precedent law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra)."
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - P S Bhati - Full Document

Tarachand Mehtar vs State Of Rajasthan on 28 November, 2019

"This Court, in light of the aforementioned position of law, disposes of the present writ petition with the direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on the post of Safai Karamchari while not considering third child after 01.06.2002 as a disqualification. Such consideration shall be made within a period of 30 days from today in accordance with these directions as well as in consonance with the present law laid down by the Division Bench of this Hon'ble Court in the matter of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Smt. Indira Devi (supra)."
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - D Mehta - Full Document

Mukesh Kumar S/O Late Shri Surendra ... vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 22 October, 2024

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG with Mr. S.P. Singh Rajawat, Assistant GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 22/10/2024 Learned counsels for the respective parties submit that the controversy involved herein is no more res integra and stands resolved by a Division Bench judgment of this Court dated (Downloaded on 23/10/2024 at 10:34:21 PM) [2024:RJ-JP:44438] (2 of 2) [CW-3301/2021] 25.10.2016 passed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Anr. versus Smt. Indira Devi: DB Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.703/2016. They, therefore, pray that this writ petition may also be disposed of in similar terms.
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - M K Goyal - Full Document
1