citedby: 72674765

The State Of Tripura vs Smt. Sutapa Majumder on 5 March, 2019

10. We also notice that in the case of one such Pharmacist, who, though was appointed in the year 1984, the matter was taken to the Hon'ble the Supreme Court, and in SLP(Civil) No.198 of 2011, titled as Manoranjan Naha vs. State of Tripura with an order dated 28.03.2011, the Court directed the State to consider the petitioner's representation.

Tripura High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 3 - S Karol - Full Document

Bimal Chandra Ghosh vs The State Of Tripura & Ors on 1 August, 2019

Ms. S. Chisim, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that these writ petitions being W.P.(C) No.434 of 2019 [Bimal Chandra Ghosh vs. State of Tripura & Ors.], W.P.(C) No.435 of 2019 [ Ram Charan Naha vs. State of Tripura & Ors.] and W.P.(C) No.436 of 2019 [Shyamal Kumar Paul vs. State of Tripura & Ors.] are squarely covered by a decision of this court in W.P.(C) 255 of 2014 Page 2 of 3 [Manoranjan Naha vs. State of Tripura] where this court had occasion to observe as under:

Tripura High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Nanu Ranjan Bhowmik vs The State Of Tripura & Ors on 19 September, 2019

Ms. S. Chisim, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that these writ petitions being W.P.(C) No.342 of 2019 [Nanu Ranjan Bhowmik vs. State of Tripura & Ors.], W.P.(C) No.343 of 2019 [Pradip Datta vs. State of Tripura & Ors.] and W.P.(C) No.356 of 2019 [Pradip Kumar Das vs. State of Tripura & Ors.] are squarely covered by a decision of this court in W.P.(C) 255 of 2014 [Manoranjan Page 2 of 3 Naha vs. State of Tripura] where this court had occasion to observe as under:

Tripura High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Shyamal Kr. Paul vs The State Of Tripura & Ars on 27 March, 2019

While filing the reply the respondents should take care of the said decision and make their averments categorical whether the previous decision encompasses the controversy or not.

Tripura High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Bimal Ch. Ghosh vs The State Of Tripura & Ors on 27 March, 2019

While filing the reply the respondents should take care of the said decision and make their averments categorical whether the previous decision encompasses the controversy or not.

Tripura High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Ram Charan Naha vs The State Of Tripura & Ars on 27 March, 2019

While filing the reply the respondents should take care of the said decision and make their averments categorical whether the previous decision encompasses the controversy or not.

Tripura High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Subrata Sinha vs The State Of Tripura & Anr on 8 April, 2019

The notice is made returnable on 13.05.2019. Ms. Chisim, learned counsel has submitted that the case of the petitioner is well covered by a previous judgment dated 26.04.2017 delivered in WP(C) No.255/2014 titled as Manoranjan Naha vs. State of Tripura.

Tripura High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Badal Laskar vs The State Of Tripura & Anr on 8 April, 2019

The notice is made returnable on 13.05.2019. Ms. Chisim, learned counsel has submitted that the case of the petitioner is well covered by a previous judgment dated 26.04.2017 delivered in WP(C) No.255/2014 titled as Manoranjan Naha vs. State of Tripura.

Tripura High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S Talapatra - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results