Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.44 seconds)

Gurcharan Singh Alias Monu vs State Of Haryana on 18 November, 2025

15. Similarly in the case of Amandeep Singh vs. State of Punjab in CRM-M-26161-2024, it has been observed by this Court that "In view of provisions of Section 82(1) Cr.P.C., it is clear that the publication was effected on 9.2.2013 and the accused was directed to appear in the Court as per that publication on 6.3.2013 which period was less than 30 days. Therefore, it cannot be held that by passing the impugned order on 13.3.2013, the publication has been effected as per the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. There was no order 5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 21-11-2025 01:27:28 ::: CRM-M-64999-2025 -6- in the publication for the accused giving specified time and place to appear on 13.3.2013. Therefore, this order is not as per law and the same is set aside."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Simrandeep Singh vs State Of Punjab on 1 December, 2025

13. Similarly in the case of Amandeep Singh vs. State of Punjab in CRM-M-26161-2024, it has been observed by this Court that "In view of provisions of Section 82(1) Cr.P.C., it is clear that the publication was effected on 9.2.2013 and the accused was directed to appear in the Court as per that publication on 6.3.2013 which period was less than 30 days. Therefore, it cannot be held that by passing the impugned order on 13.3.2013, the publication has been effected as per the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. There was no order in the publication for the accused giving specified time and place to appear on 13.3.2013. Therefore, this order is not as per law and the same is set aside."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Narinder Kaur vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 16 February, 2023

1. The consideration in the present appeal is to the judgment/order dated 11.04.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge, in Civil Writ Petition No.3870 of 2018 titled Amandeep Singh vs. State of Punjab and others, whereby respondent No.2 is directed to ensure that no commercial activity is carried out in the premises in question and action as per law be initiated against the officers, who allegedly accepted licence fee from respondent No.4 for allowing commercial activity in the residential area, by the present appellant, who was arrayed as respondent No.4.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Gurjaswinder Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab And Others on 7 March, 2024

4. Learned counsel for respondent No.6 submits that after 25.05.2023, services of some of the petitioners have been terminated and the said termination was challenged by them by filing CWP-267- 2024 titled as 'Joga Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others'; CWP-309- 2024 titled as 'Amandeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others'; CWP- 310-2024 titled as 'Mani Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and others'; CWP- 313-2024 titled as 'Surinder Pal Sharma Vs. State of Punjab and others' and CWP-319-2024 titled as 'Gurtej Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others' which were dismissed by this Court vide judgment dated 19.01.2024 by holding that the writ petition against the private contractor is not maintainable.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Balbir Singh vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 17 September, 2024

Learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submits that keeping in view the order passed by this Court in CWP-29487-2022 titled as Amandeep Singh vs. State of Punjab and others decided on 03.07.2024 wherein, it has been held that the Director is the competent authority to pass the order of punishment, present petition may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further qua challenge to the order of punishment as of now with liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate appeal before the appellate authority.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - H S Sethi - Full Document

Sukhpal Singh vs State Of Punjab And Others on 2 December, 2025

2. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that after filing of the present writ petition, the Government of Punjab, Department of Finance has issued a Notification dated 22.05.2025, whereby employees, like the petitioner, has been held entitled for benefit benefit of Old Pension Scheme. He further submits that a similarly situated employee had filed a writ petition CWP-11266 11266-2024 titled as Amandeep Singh Vs. State of Punjab before this Court.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1