Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 25 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Chhattisgarh vs Ganesh Ram Yadav 85 Mac/62/2015 ... on 18 June, 2019

State vs Ashutosh on 23 May, 2025

In view of the aforesaid discussions, I am of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to prove charges against accused State Vs Ashutosh Kumar & Ors SC No. 797/2018 FIR No. 523/2018 13/14 Ashutosh and Kaushlender and thus, failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, both accused Ashutosh and Kaushlender stand acquitted for the offences u/s 392/394/506/34 IPC. Further, accused Kaushlender also stands acquitted from the offence u/s 411 IPC.
Delhi District Court Cites 25 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Ganesh on 2 September, 2023

On 13.07.2021 he was standing at Mangalam Red Light along with Ct. Suresh when secret informer came and stated that the accused who is wanted in the present case is standing near Akshardham Flyover. When the witness requested 4-5 public persons to join the investigation, they refused citing their genuine problems. Thereafter witness along with Ct. Suresh and informer went to the Akshardham flyover where secret informer pointed towards the accused. Thereafter he with the help of Ct. Suresh apprehended Digitally signed by UDBHAV UDBHAV KUMAR JAIN FIR No. 177/2021 State vs. Ganesh KUMAR Date: Page no.5 of 11 JAIN 2023.09.02 17:46:27 +0530 that person and on asking his name, he stated himself to be Ganesh. Accused Ganesh was arrested as per arrest memo and personally searched as per personal search memo. Disclosure statement of witness was also recorded wherein he disclosed that he had sold the articles stolen from complainant's house to one Guddu Kabadi. When said Guddu Kabadi was not found even after obtaining police custody remand of accused, he informed that due to fear he had stated the name of Guddu Kabadi and also stated that the case property is in his possession, and he had spent some amount. Supplementary disclosure statement of accused was recorded in that regard. Thereafter, accused led them to Noida Mod and beneath the flyover he got recovered one plastic bag from which few documents and four currency notes of denomination of Rs.500/- were recovered. The same was seized vide seizure memo. Thereafter the clothes which accused was seen wearing in the CCTV footage were also recovered. Witness also prepared the site plan of the recovery site. For inquiry of status of his case complainant had visited PS where he saw the accused in the PS and immediately identified him as the same person who was seen in CCTV footage and had committed theft in his house. On 17.07.2021 complainant came to the PS and informed that the jewelry which he had stated to be stolen was not stolen and the same was kept by his daughter-in-law and statement of complainant to that regard was also recorded. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was prepared and same was filed in the court. Witness identified the accused correctly in the Court.
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Autar Shivharey And Another vs State Of U.P. on 18 July, 2019

Therefore, the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.08.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C. court no.2), Hamirpur in Special Case No.33 of 2003, State Vs. Ram Autar Shivharey and others, arising out of case crime no.173 of 2003, police station- Biwar, District- Hamirpur is accordingly modified to the extent as above and these appeals are accordingly partly allowed, as aforesaid.
Allahabad High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 October, 2025

(c) After verification of deposition of compounding fee/charges by Electricity Department, the entire proceeding arising out of Special Case no. 255 of 2025 (State vs. Ashutosh Yadav) arising out of Case Crime no. 218 of 2022, under Section 135 Electricity Act, PS- Anti Power Theft, District Azamgarh, shall immediately be closed only in respect of applicant herein and consigned to record.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S Srivastava - Full Document

Ashutosh Mishra vs State Of U.P. And Another on 4 March, 2025

It is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to stay the further proceedings of Criminal Case No.25675 of 2023 (State v. Ashutosh Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No.439 of 2021, under Section 328, 376, 506, 406 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Prayagraj, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad, nad/or to pass such other and further order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, otherwise the Applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and injury."
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - R Misra - Full Document

Ashutosh Mali vs State Of U.P. And Another on 6 April, 2026

8. Hence, in view of all consideration, the cognizance and summoning order dated 27.11.2024, passed by Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Prayagraj in Special Session Trial No. 271 of 2024 (State Vs. Ashutosh Mali), including charge sheet No. 5 /2022 dated 13.1.2022, arising out of Case Crime No. 257/2021 under section 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3(2) Va of SC/ST Act, Police Station Tharwai, District Prayagraj as well as entire proceedings of aforesaid Special Session Trial No. 271 of 2024, are hereby quashed.
Allahabad High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ashutosh Kumar vs State on 18 December, 2025

1. The present revision petition has been filed under Section 438 read with Section 440 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, 'BNSS') assailing the impugned order dated 28.05.2025, passed by Ld. JMFC-02 (West), THC, Delhi in criminal case No. 75080/2016 titled as State v. Ashutosh Kumar, vide which the application filed by the revisionist/accused for discharge was dismissed.
Delhi District Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Avinash Yadav @ Babloo Yadav And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 11 November, 2019

This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the quashing of entire proceedings of Case No.3890 of 2018 (State vs. Avinash Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 893 of 2015, u/s 452, 308 and 323 IPC Police Station Hata, District-Kushinagar, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kushinagar.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - K N Bajpayee - Full Document
1   2 3 Next