Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.81 seconds)
Documents citing Dr. R. Murali vs Dr. R. Kamalakkannan And Three Others on 1 October, 1999

Dr.R.Ilayaraja vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 September, 2003

24. Moreover, the Supreme Court in KUMARI CHITRA GHISE v. UNION OF INDIA (AIR 1970 SC 35) and D.N.CHANCHALA v. STATE FO MYSORE (AIR 197 1 SC 1762) and a Full Bench of this Court in BHUPESHKAR S.R. AND OTHERS v. THESECRETARY, SELECTION COMMITTEE, SABARMATHI HOSTEL AND OTHERS (1995 WLR 639) and another Full Bench of this Court in Dr.R.MURALI v. Dr. R.KAMALAKKANNAN (1999 (III) CTC 675) held that the Government would not be denied of its right to decide the sources from which the admission should be made as it is the Government which bears the financial burden of running the medical colleges. Therefore, the State Government is justified in its stand in making available 50% of seats to inservice candidates as it requires 3051 medical practitioners to serve in the Government Hospitals or hospitals run by the local bodies or the Government. The inservice candidates are also required to give an undertaking to serve in the Government Hospitals for 15 years. So far as the candidates selected under open category are concerned, there is absolutely no fetter on them to work in the Government Hospitals or hospitals run by the local bodies or the Government and when the Government felt that there is shortage of hands in the Government Hospitals, the clause making available 50% of the seats to inservice candidates cannot be said to be unreasonable or arbitrary and I hold that the clause is not unconstitutional and cannot be struck down on the ground that merit is sacrificed.
Madras High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Awadhesh Kumar Yadav vs General Manager, N E Rly on 6 February, 2026

(iv) The above said decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court were followed by the Full Bench of this Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 MADRAS 174 (R.Murali v. R.Kamalakkannan) (FB) and in paragraph 55, question No.2 was answered thus, "Question No.2: We hold that writ petitioners are not entitled to challenge the selection after having participated in the written examination on the principle of estoppel."
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dr.A.R.Balamurugan vs The Secretary To Government on 30 January, 2009

9.4 In 1999 (III) CTC - 675 (Dr.R.MURALI Vs. Dr.R.KAMALAKKANNAN AND THREE OTHERS), the Full Bench of the Principal Bench had clearly held that when a person applied for admission based on condition stated in the prospectus and wrote examinations without protest, he cannot question the selection process. The Full Bench has at length considered various pronouncements of the Honourable Apex Court and finally held that "Having participated in the written test and after fully knowing terms and conditions of prospectus, candidate estopped from questioning selection process."
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Indian Airlines Limited (Southern ... vs K.Narayanan on 22 February, 2007

(iv) The above said decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court were folowed by the Full Bench of this Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 MADRAS 174 (R.Murali v. R.Kamalakkannan)(FB) and in paragraph 55, question No.2 was answered thus, "Question No.2: We hold that writ petitioners are not entitled to challenge the selection after having participated in the written examination on the principle of estoppel."
Madras High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 4 - N N Vasanthakumar - Full Document

Dr.S.Rajesh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 12 December, 2008

(iv) The above said decisions of the Supreme Court were followed by the Full Bench of this Court in the decision reported in AIR 2000 MADRAS 174 (R.Murali v. R.Kamalakkannan)(FB) and in paragraph 55, question No.2 was answered thus, "Question No.2: We hold that writ petitioners are not entitled to challenge the selection after having participated in the written examination on the principle of estoppel."
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 4 - N N Vasanthakumar - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next