Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)
Documents citing Vicky @ Vivek vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh Judgement ... on 16 January, 2014

Vicky @ Vivek vs State Of Mp on 1 December, 2020

It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH MCRC-47127-2020 (VICKY @ VIVEK Vs STATE OF MP) applicant has false been implicated in the present case and he has not committed any crime in any manner. It is further submitted that he is only a labour whose work is to comply with the directions issued by his employer. Allegation regarding misappropriation of funds is not attributable to him. It is pointed-out that the said offences which are registered against the applicant the maximum punishment is up to three years, they are cognizable offence and triable by Magistrate.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - V Mishra - Full Document

Vicky vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 20 March, 2025

7. Ld. Counsel for appellant has prayed that the appellant is not involved in any other criminal case and is leading a life of peaceful and responsible citizen. The report of previous convictions/involvements is on record, which shows that appellant is CA/50/2022, CNR No.: DLWT01-002071-2022 Page 3 of 5 Vicky Vs. State Judgement dt. 20.3.2025 not involved in any other criminal case. Vide order on sentenced dated 2.2.2022, the convict was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and a fine in the sum of Rs.10,000/-. As per record, the convict has remained in judicial custody from 14.8.2017 till 25.9.2017 i.e. for 41 days. Whereas I uphold the order of fine in the sum of Rs.10,000/-, I would like to modify the part of order in which three years sentence has been awarded.
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1