Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Documents citing M/S. Deep Sea Shipping And Manning ... vs Manu Mamachan Bahurasanam And Ors on 4 October, 2018

M/S K.B.G. Engineers vs Delhi Tourism And Transportation ... on 28 July, 2022

Services vs. Union of India & Ors. MANU/RH/0650/2021, wherein a reference has been made to the case of Vidya Drolia (supra) to observe that pursuant to the insertion of Section 11(6)(a) in the A&C Act of 1996, the Court pursuant to an application under Section 11(6) of the A&C Act, 1996 has to follow the ARB.P. 577/2022 Page 3 of 9 appointment of an Arbitrator as a rule. The only exceptions are when the Arbitration Agreement is manifestly non-existent/invalid or the disputes are ex-facie non-arbitrable.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - N B Krishna - Full Document

M/S. Anglo Eastern Ship Management Ltd vs Natwarlal Khalasi on 17 December, 2018

DATE : December 17, 2018 Not on board. Taken up on production. Civil Application St. No.20962 of 2018 By relying upon the order dated 04/10/2018 in Civil Application No.2915/2018 in First Appeal (St) No.20981 of 2018 (M/s Deep Sea Shipping and Mannin Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Many Mamachan Bahurasanam Kinnsyumukhy Manalil) it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that it was not open for the learned Commissioner to have awarded compensation beyond what is permissible under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. Relying upon paragraph 5 of the Civil Application it is submitted that the amount of compensation as payable under the Schedule would be Rs.6,33,360/-
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - A S Chandurkar - Full Document

M/S. Anglo Eastern Ship Management Ltd vs Natwarlal Khalasi on 17 December, 2018

DATE : December 17, 2018 Not on board. Taken up on production. Civil Application St. No.20962 of 2018 By relying upon the order dated 04/10/2018 in Civil Application No.2915/2018 in First Appeal (St) No.20981 of 2018 (M/s Deep Sea Shipping and Mannin Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. Many Mamachan Bahurasanam Kinnsyumukhy Manalil) it is submitted on behalf of the appellant that it was not open for the learned Commissioner to have awarded compensation beyond what is permissible under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. Relying upon paragraph 5 of the Civil Application it is submitted that the amount of compensation as payable under the Schedule would be Rs.6,33,360/-
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - A S Chandurkar - Full Document
1