Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 73 (0.62 seconds)
Documents citing Kokku Parthasaradhi Naidu Garu vs Chintalachervu Koteswara Rao Garu And ... on 12 November, 1923

O. A. O. K. Lakshmanan Chettiar vs J.S. Kannappar And Ors. on 30 September, 1926

We think that that distinction drawn by the Rangoon Court was correctly drawn and that nothing in the decision of the Full Bench in Parthasarathy Naidu v. Koteswara Rao A. I. R. 1924 Mad. 561 precludes us from holding, as we hold, that under the Municipal Act and the Rules the Chief Judge, for this purpose is persona designate and not merely a selected member of the Court chosen to represent it. That being so, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this revision petition, and it must be dismissed with costs.
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Nara Narayan Mandal vs Aghore Chandra Ganguli And Anr. on 18 April, 1935

43. It was decided by a Full Bench of the Madras High Court in Parthasaradhi Naidu v. Kateswara Rao 17 M. 369 : 78 Ind. Cas. 98 : 46 M.L.J. 201 : 19 L.W. 402 : (1924) M.W.N. 272 : A.I.R. 1924 Mad. 581, which was a decision under Local Boards Act (XIV of 1920) that inasmuch as by Rule 4(3) of the Rules for the conduct of inquiries under that Act powers were given to the District or Subordinate Judge in certain cases to direct any Court subordinate to him to hold the inquiry, the reference to a Judge with such powers could not mean anything else than reference to a Judge sitting as a Judge in the exercise of his ordinary jurisdiction extended for that purpose.
Calcutta High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

R.K.A. Poonuraman vs Rajappa Malavarayar on 13 April, 1959

He point out that this Full Bench decision distinguished the earlier Full Bench decision cited in Parthasarathi Naidu v. Koteswara Rao, ILR 47 Mad 369: (AIR 1924 Mad 561) which held the contrary view, namely, that when it was named as a District Judge or a Subordinate Judge the District Judge or Subordinate Judge was not acting merely as a persona designata but also was acting as a Court.
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lic vs Nandini J. Shah . on 20 February, 2018

The Court concluded that the order passed by the District Judge as an appellate authority under Section 9 of the State Act does not cease to be a Court subordinate to the High Court and any order passed by him is amenable to the jurisdiction of the High Court under Section 115 C.P.C.. In support of this conclusion, the learned Single Judge relied upon the exposition in the case of Central Talkies Ltd. (supra) and Parthasaradhi Naidu Vs. Koteswara Rao.43 43 ILR (1924) 47 Mad 369
Supreme Court of India Cites 116 - Cited by 35 - A M Khanwilkar - Full Document

O.A.O.K. Latchmanan Chettiar vs J.S. Kannappar And Ors. on 30 September, 1926

We think that that distinction drawn by the Rangoon Court was correctly drawn and that nothing in the decision of the Full Bench in Parthasarathi Naidu v. Koteswara Rao (1923) I.L.R. 4.7 M 369 : 46 M L J 201 (F B) precludes us from holding, as we do hold, that under the Municipal Act and the Rules the Chief Judge for this purpose is persona designata and not merely a selected member of the Court chosen to represent it. That being so, we have no jurisdiction to entertain this revision petition, and it must be dismissed with costs.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

Ravindra Kumar vs Rent Authority Additional District And ... on 19 February, 2026

In the words of Schwabe, C.J. in Parthasaradhi Naidu v. Koteswara Rao [ILR (1924) 47 Mad 369 : AIR 1924 Mad 561 (FB)] , personae designatae are ''persons selected to act in their private capacity and not in their capacity as Judges'. The same consideration applies also to a well-known officer like the District Magistrate named by virtue of his office, and whose powers the Additional District Magistrate can also exercise and who can create other officers equal to himself for the purposes of the Eviction Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document

Radha Kishan Yadav vs State Of U.P. And Others on 26 November, 2021

In the words of Schwabe, C.J. in Parthasaradhi Naidu v. Koteswara Rao [ILR (1924) 47 Mad 369 : AIR 1924 Mad 561 (FB)] , personae designatae are ''persons selected to act in their private capacity and not in their capacity as Judges'. The same consideration applies also to a well-known officer like the District Magistrate named by virtue of his office, and whose powers the Additional District Magistrate can also exercise and who can create other officers equal to himself for the purposes of the Eviction Act.
Allahabad High Court Cites 62 - Cited by 1 - Y K Srivastava - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next