Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1231 (3.04 seconds)
Documents citing Chaman Lal Saraf (Dead)By Lrs. & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 December, 2014

The Akash Co-Op, Group Housing Society ... vs State Of Haryana And Another on 27 May, 2020

(iv) For the appeals which were time barred and where delay have occurred, the landowners shall not be entitled for the statutory interest for the delayed period, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Imrat Lal and others (supra) and Dhiraj Singh (D) through LRs (supra). and as discussed in para No.18 as they have not chosen to agitate for their grievance within the time prescribed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 50 - Cited by 1 - G S Sandhawalia - Full Document

Arjun Andors vs State Of Haryana on 7 June, 2023

Apart from that, it was also apparent that there was no repetition of blows by Arjun on the abdomen of PW-2. If he had the intention to cause death of PW-2 Rajwati, he would have caused repeated blows on her abdomen. Apart from that, the prosecution could only lead 8 of 12 ::: Downloaded on - 08-06-2023 22:48:04 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:081800 CRA-S-1134-SB-2008 (O&M) -9- 2023:PHHC:081800 evidence, which showed that PW-2 Rajwati had suffered grievous injuries and not such injuries which would be sufficient to cause death of PW-2 Rajwati in ordinary course of nature. Apart from that, the intention to cause death of PW-2 Rajwati was totally absent and the findings recorded by learned trial Court do not require any interference by this Court and CRR No.2263 of 2003 titled as 'Chaman Vs. State of Haryana,' is, accordingly, dismissed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

General Manager vs Smt. Kamla Devi And Others on 24 November, 2025

In Irshad Ali and others versus Hazi Abdul Sukhur rt Mozumdar (supra) and Ramesh Singh (died) through LRs versus State of Haryana (supra) the petitioners therein had unsuccessfully assailed the award passed by the learned Reference Court and on account of finality having been achieved in their respective cases, Hon'ble Supreme Court did not grant them the relief prayed for.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - A M Goel - Full Document

The Mandal Revenue Officer vs U.Gangamma on 17 October, 2025

In Horrmal (Deceased) through his LRs and others v State of Haryana & Others2, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, inter alia, held that the sale exemplars in respect of the small extents of land can be taken into consideration for fixation of Market Value and observed that appropriate deductions ranging from 20% which may even go upto 80% can be made.
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - N Jayasurya - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next