Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1133 (2.11 seconds)
Documents citing State Of Haryana vs Chandra Mani & Ors on 30 January, 1996

Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Binod Kumar Maheswari & Ors on 9 February, 2024

It was rendered at a point of time when the decisions in Katiji [Collector (LA) v. Katiji, (1987) 2 SCC 107] , Ramegowda [G. Ramegowda v. LAO, (1988) 2 SCC 142] , Chandra Mani [State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 SCC 132] , K.V. Ayisumma [Tehsildar (LA) v. K.V. Ayisumma, (1996) 10 SCC 634] and Lipok AO [State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao, (2005) 3 SCC 752 : 2005 SCC (Cri) 906] were holding the field. It is not that the said decisions do not hold the field now, having been overruled by any subsequent decision.
Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Manipur And Ors. vs A.K. Cycle And Allied Centre And Ors. on 14 February, 2008

Para 18. The above position was highlighted in State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and Ors. ; and Special Tehsildar, Land Acquisition, Kerala v. K. V. Ayisumma . It was noted that adoption of strict standard of proof sometimes fail to protect public justice, and it would result in public mischief by skilful management of delay in the process of filing an appeal.
Gauhati High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 4 - T N Singh - Full Document

Shivamma (Dead) By Lrs vs Karnataka Housing Board on 12 September, 2025

250. As far back as 1996, this Court in Chandra Mani (supra) held that where the case requires an appeal or application to be filed, despite the delay, then prompt action should be pursued by the officer responsible to file the appeal and he should be made personally responsible for lapses, if any. Thus, even if for a moment, we accept that, mala-fide actions of few officers should not be imputed to the Government, the position still remains that, once the State or its instrumentality finds that, few of its officers were negligent, it should promptly take action to file the appeal or application, as the case may be, through its other officers and simultaneously take action against the delinquent officers.
Supreme Court of India Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others vs Of on 6 May, 2016

In dealing with the applications for condonation of delay filed on behalf of the State and its agencies/instrumentalities this Court has, while emphasizing that same yardstick should be applied for deciding the applications for condonation of delay filed by private individuals and the State, observed that certain amount of latitude is not impermissible in the latter case because the State represents collective cause of the community and the decisions are taken by the officers/agencies at a slow pace and encumbered process of pushing the files from table to table consumes considerable time causing delay - G. Ramegowda v. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer (1988) 2 SCC 142, State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani (1996) 3 SCC 132, State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra (1996) 9 SCC 309, State of Bihar v. Ratan Lal Sahu (1996) 10 SCC 635, State of Nagaland v. Lipok Ao (2005) 3 SCC 752, and State (NCT of Delhi) v. Ahmed Jaan (2008) 14 SCC 582.
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - T S Chauhan - Full Document

Madhya Pradesh Road Development ... vs M/S Vindhyachal Expressway Pvt. Ltd. on 28 February, 2024

(Chandra Mani case [State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani, (1996) 3 SCC 132] , SCC p. 138, para 11) "11. ... When the State is an applicant, praying for condonation of delay, it is common knowledge that on account of impersonal machinery and the inherited bureaucratic methodology imbued with the note-making, file-pushing, and passing-on-the-buck ethos, delay on the part of the State is less difficult to understand though more difficult to approve, but the State represents collective cause of the community. It is axiomatic that decisions are taken by officers/agencies proverbially at slow pace and encumbered process of pushing the files from table to table and keeping it on table for considerable time causing delay
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - S Paul - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next