Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 439 (1.09 seconds)
Documents citing Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok Hurra & Anr on 10 April, 2002

Aqama Builders And Developers Ltd. ... vs Civil Judge,Senior ... on 7 May, 2022

We are of the view that the aforesaid proposition laid down in Surya Dev Rai [Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, (2003) 6 SCC 675] , is contrary to the ratio in Mirajkar [Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1967 SC 1 : (1966) 3 SCR 744] and the ratio in Mirajkar [Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1967 SC 1 : (1966) 3 SCR 744] has not been overruled in Rupa Ashok Hurra [Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra, (2002) 4 SCC 388] .
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - S Chandra - Full Document

Ms Anupam vs The State Of Manipur on 28 February, 2025

2. Rupa Ashok Hura vs. Ashok Hura and Ors., (2002) 4 SCC 388 This matter is regarding the issue of whether a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution can be maintained to question the validity of a judgment of this Court after the petition for review of the said judgment has been dismissed. It is a matrimonial dispute between the parties. It was held that the Supreme Court after review can reconsider a judgment on the ground that it is vitiated being in violation of principles of natural justice or scope for apprehension of bias due to a judge or on account of abuse of the process of the court.
Manipur High Court Cites 61 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharma Oja Alias Dharma Kanta Oja vs Nanda Ram Oja on 13 September, 2011

However, we are not oblivious of a decision of this Court in Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai [(2003) 6 SCC 675] wherein this Court upon noticing Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar [(1966)3 SCR 744 : AIR 1967 SC 1] WA 201 of 2011 Page 5 of 12 6 and also relying on a Constitution Bench of this Court in Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra [(2002)4 SCC 388] opined that a Judicial Court would also be subject to exercise of writ jurisdiction of the High Court.
Gauhati High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - A K Goel - Full Document

Smt. Nongmeirakpam Sanatombi Devi vs Director.Rims on 22 February, 2017

14. It was so happened that the Hon'ble Supreme Court without considering the decisions of the Constitution Bench and also the 3 (three) Judges Bench of the Supreme Court in Ashok Hurra and Another's case (supra) and in Salem Advocate Bar Association, T.N.'s case (supra) respectively that procedure is a handmaid and not the Mistress of justice and it is made to advance the cause of justice and not to defeat it in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hilli Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. AIR 2016 SC 86 held that "17.
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next