Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.02 seconds)
Documents citing Amar Kumar Agrawal vs Ramesh Singh 2 Cra/766/2017 Neelu @ ... on 6 February, 2020

Cc No. 515497/2016 Anil Verma vs Manoj Verma Page 1 Of 26 on 27 February, 2021

33. It cannot be said that that mere fact that the loan has been advanced in cash or that when it is not reflected in the ITR of the Complainant, the said facts would ipso facto cast aspersions on the case of the Complainant. The Income Tax Act is a distinct statute and the assessee will be liable to the consequences therein, as that matter is between the revenue and the assessee. However, it cannot be said that the prosecution u/s 138 of the NI Act in respect of the said loan would become non-maintainable. Reliance is placed on Sheela Sharma Vs. Mahendra Pal Crl.L.P No. 559/2015 (DelHC) and Amar Kumar Agarwal Vs. Ramesh Singh, CRA. No. 766/2017 (ChattisgarhHC).
Delhi District Court Cites 24 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Amar Kaur And 3 Others on 4 November, 2022

2. These two appeals arise out of an award made by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Aligarh1 in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 709 of 2014 (Amar Kaur and another Vs. Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Co. Ltd. and others) dated 11.04.2017 by partly allowing the claim of the claimants. 2.1. The appeals have been filed by the Insurance Company and the claimants respectively and are being decided by a common judgement.
Allahabad High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Bhanot - Full Document

Nishi Rastogi vs Reeta Gupta on 30 September, 2021

8. It is also worthy to be noted that after closing the opportunity to file written arguments or advancing final arguments vide order dated 16.03.2021, the matter was listed for orders on 15.04.2021. From the order dated 16.03.2021 it is apparent that the arguments in the matter stood concluded on 16.03.2021 and the matter on that day was adjourned for orders for 15.04.2021. The written submissions are stated to have been filed by the petitioner/accused on 19.08.2021, admittedly, after five months of the matter being listed for orders. Eventually the Ld. M.M. passed the judgment on 24.08.2021 convicting he petitioner and listed the matter for arguments on sentence for 30.09.2021 i.e. for today. It is note worthy that the petitioner has not challenged the order of 16.03.2021 till passing of judgment against her in the present matter and it is only after the judgment was pronounced against her that she preferred the present revision petition challenging the order dated 16.03.2021. In this regard it would be relevant to consider that an order declining to take on record the written submissions is in the nature of an interlocutory order and hence, not a revisable order. (Amar Nath vs. State of Cr. Rev. No. 81/2021 Page no. 7/8 Haryana, 1978(1) SCR 222 and Madhu Limye vs. State of Maharashtra, 1978(1) SCR 749, referred to.)
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Sheela vs Dr. Amar Singh on 31 July, 2024

3. Present appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') read with Section 14(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 arising from the judgement and order dated 23.9.1998 passed by Third Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jalaun at Orai, in Marriage Petition No. 29 of 1991 (Dr. Amar Singh vs Smt. Sheela). Thereby, the marriage between the parties has been dissolved by learned trial court under Section 13 of the Act, on the ground of cruelty alleged by the respondent.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S D Singh - Full Document

Deepak Agrawal vs State Of U.P. And Another on 25 August, 2023

This application under Section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking direction to the court below for early disposal of Case No. 940 of 2020/22442 of 2022 (Deepak Agrawal Vs. Smt. Jyoti Singh), under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station - Sadar Bazar, District - Jhansi, pending in the Court of learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 3/ Judicial Magistrate, Jhansi.
Allahabad High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1