Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.39 seconds)
Documents citing Berojgar Audyogik Kalyan Samiti vs State Of U.P. on 4 May, 2023

Nagendra Ram vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

13. The first issue to be considered is as to whether the CITS is a mandatory qualification; as one issued under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It has to be noticed that a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Berojgar Audhyogik Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh; MANU/UP/0024/23, has held; based on the changes modifying the mandatory nature of the CITS to a Patna High Court CWJC No.15816 of 2023 dt.17-05-2024 19/35 desirable one, that Upendra Narain Singh (supra) as affirmed by a Division Bench is of no help to the petitioners therein who had also raised a similar challenge against the selection, asserting the mandatory nature of the CITS.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajiw Ranjan vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

13. The first issue to be considered is as to whether the CITS is a mandatory qualification; as one issued under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It has to be noticed that a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Berojgar Audhyogik Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh; MANU/UP/0024/23, has held; based on the changes modifying the mandatory nature of the CITS to a Patna High Court CWJC No.15816 of 2023 dt.17-05-2024 19/35 desirable one, that Upendra Narain Singh (supra) as affirmed by a Division Bench is of no help to the petitioners therein who had also raised a similar challenge against the selection, asserting the mandatory nature of the CITS.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Golden Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

13. The first issue to be considered is as to whether the CITS is a mandatory qualification; as one issued under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It has to be noticed that a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Berojgar Audhyogik Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh; MANU/UP/0024/23, has held; based on the changes modifying the mandatory nature of the CITS to a Patna High Court CWJC No.15816 of 2023 dt.17-05-2024 19/35 desirable one, that Upendra Narain Singh (supra) as affirmed by a Division Bench is of no help to the petitioners therein who had also raised a similar challenge against the selection, asserting the mandatory nature of the CITS.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kaushik Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 17 May, 2024

13. The first issue to be considered is as to whether the CITS is a mandatory qualification; as one issued under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It has to be noticed that a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Berojgar Audhyogik Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh; MANU/UP/0024/23, has held; based on the changes modifying the mandatory nature of the CITS to a Patna High Court CWJC No.15816 of 2023 dt.17-05-2024 19/35 desirable one, that Upendra Narain Singh (supra) as affirmed by a Division Bench is of no help to the petitioners therein who had also raised a similar challenge against the selection, asserting the mandatory nature of the CITS.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sunil Kumar vs The Union Of India on 17 May, 2024

13. The first issue to be considered is as to whether the CITS is a mandatory qualification; as one issued under Article 73 of the Constitution of India. It has to be noticed that a Division Bench of Allahabad High Court in Berojgar Audhyogik Kalyan Samiti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh; MANU/UP/0024/23, has held; based on the changes modifying the mandatory nature of the CITS to a Patna High Court CWJC No.15816 of 2023 dt.17-05-2024 19/35 desirable one, that Upendra Narain Singh (supra) as affirmed by a Division Bench is of no help to the petitioners therein who had also raised a similar challenge against the selection, asserting the mandatory nature of the CITS.
Patna High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1