Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.52 seconds)
Documents citing Harendra Singh vs State Of U.P. on 23 July, 2013

Rakesh Katiyar vs State Of U.P. & Anr. on 24 October, 2019

It is also pertinent to mention here that after the conclusion of the first phase of recruitment, several writ petitions were filed challenging the recruitment process and the said bunch was heard together. The leading case was Harendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. in Writ Petition No. 2809 (SS) of 2005 and the said bunch of writ petitions were dismissed by this Court by judgment and order dated 23.8.2005 wherein it was held as under:-
Allahabad High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - R Singh - Full Document

Yogesh Kumar @ Yogesh Kushwaha vs State Of U.P. on 2 February, 2021

Bail Application No. 30326 of 2020 (Harendra Vs. State of U.P.), copy of the said order has been produced before the Court which is taken on record. The applicant claims parity with the aforesaid co-accused persons. It is argued that the police has shown three cases registered against him out of which in one case final report has been submitted and in two other cases he is on bail. The said fact is mentioned and explained in para-13 of the affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 30.8.2020.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Harendra Singh vs State Of U.P. on 7 March, 2024

Earlier this Court had granted bail to the applicant by order dated 28.03.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6970 of 2022 (Harendra Singh vs. State of U.P.) in Case Crime No. 215 of 2021 under Section 120-B IPC solely on the footing that the applicant was part of a criminal conspiracy to murder the deceased. Relevant part of the aforesaid order is extracted hereunder:
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Bhanot - Full Document

Mahendra @ Hullarh vs State Of U.P. on 22 January, 2021

Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is argued that from the pointing out of the applicant an axe has been show to be recovered but there is no evidence whatsoever to corroborate the use of the same in the present incident. It is argued that the present case is a case of circumstantial evidence and there is no eye witness to the incident. It is argued that co-accused Harendra Singh has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 01.05.2018 passed in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 16233 of 2018 (Harendra Singh Vs. State of U.P.). It is further argued that from the pointing out of co-accused Ravindra, head of the deceased was recovered. It is further argued that co-accused Ravindra has also been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.10.2020 passed in Crl.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - S Gopal - Full Document

Rajan Singh vs State Of U.P. on 8 April, 2021

Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that FIR was lodged in the matter on the basis of false facts. No specific role has been assigned in the FIR. Referring to the contents of the FIR as well as the statement of the witnesses it was further argued that none of the witness has made clear about the weapon used by the applicant. It is also argued that indiscriminate firing is said to have been made in the house of the informant by the accused persons but no charge sheet has been submitted under Section 452 IPC and some of the accused named in the FIR have been exonerated. Thus, referring to the aforesaid fact, it was further argued that non submission of the charge sheet against all the accused persons reflect that FIR has been lodged on the basis of false facts. It was next contended that one of the accused has been enlarged on bail by this Court vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 43858 of 2018 (Harendra Vs. State of U. P.). Thus, prayer was made to allow the present bail application.
Allahabad High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Harendra Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 4 December, 2019

This criminal appeal under Section 14 A (2) of Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 2015 (in short "S.C./S.T. Act") has been filed for setting-aside the bail rejection order dated 09.07.2019 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST ActAligarh, in Bail Application No. 2637 of 2019 (Harendra Singh Vs. State of U.P), arising out of case crime no. 148 of 2019, under Sections 363, 366, 466, 468, 469, 471 IPC and Section 3 (2) (5) SC/ST Act, Police Station- Tappal, District- Aligarh.
Allahabad High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - R Chaturvedi - Full Document
1   2 Next