Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.32 seconds)
Documents citing Chandrashekhar Junjappa Sooranagi vs The State Of Karnataka Reptd By Spp on 25 August, 2011

Halsuru Ps vs Uttahiah on 8 April, 2026

24. The accused counsel relied on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka between Chandrashekar Junjappa Vs State of Karnataka, reported in 2013 (1) AKR 346. The Hon'ble High Court, in the facts and circumstances of that case, has held that, "The prosecution has not come up with clean hands-Majority of prosecution witnesses were interested witnesses and even among them there was gross inconsistency- None of the eyewitnesses could give a clear and correct account of the incident."
Bangalore District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. H.N.Latha vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2018

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that the said Revision Petition bearing R.P.No.700/2017 pending before the Deputy Commissioner, has no bearing on her right, title and ownership over the lands. He would further submit that in the light of the provisions of Sections 128 and 129 of The Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, respondent No.2 is required to carry out the survey and phodi proceedings and in this regard he would also place reliance on the ruling in the case of Chandrashekhar Vs. State of Karnataka reported in 2016(3) KCCR 2466, wherein this Court at paragraph 6 has held that the Deputy Commissioner cannot determine the rights of the parties in respect of the immovable property contrary to the documents on which the petitioner therein was claiming his rights.
Karnataka High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - G Narendar - Full Document
1