Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.24 seconds)

Vijay Pd vs The Bihar State Electricity Board And ... on 9 February, 2026

In support of his contention, reliance has been placed by learned Senior counsel on the judgment in the case of Jagdish Shah versus the State of Bihar; 2011 (3) PLJR 653, Ravi Ranjan versus Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank and others (judgment dated 1.2.2014; CWJC no. 1380 of 2020), Surendra Prasad Singh versus Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (order dated 28.4.2001; CWJC no. 2624 of 2017) and Punjab National Bank versus Kunj Bihari 7 Mishra; (1998) 7 SCC 84. It is thus submitted that the modified order of punishment dated 18.11.2014 whereby the punishment of stoppage of two annual increment with cumulative effect has been imposed on the petitioner, is not sustainable and be set aside.
Patna High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P Sarthy - Full Document

Vijay Pd vs The Bihar State Electricity Board And ... on 20 February, 2026

In support of his contention, reliance has been placed by learned Senior counsel on the judgment in the case of Jagdish Shah versus the State of Bihar; 2011 (3) PLJR 653, Ravi Ranjan versus Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank and others (judgment dated 1.2.2014; CWJC no. 1380 of 2020), Surendra Prasad Singh versus Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (order dated 28.4.2001; CWJC no. 2624 of 2017) and Punjab National Bank versus Kunj Bihari 7 Mishra; (1998) 7 SCC 84. It is thus submitted that the modified order of punishment dated 18.11.2014 whereby the punishment of stoppage of two annual increment with cumulative effect has been imposed on the petitioner, is not sustainable and be set aside.
Patna High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P Sarthy - Full Document
1