Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.37 seconds)
Documents citing Suo Motu vs S.J. Gaekwad, Registrar, Gujarat High ... on 19 January, 2001

High Court Of Gujarat Through Registrar ... vs Neha Nirmalsinh Zala on 18 February, 2019

10. Be that as it may, we find that the order and direction under challenge is uncalled for and in clear contravention of law laid down by Division Bench of this Court in Suo Motu Vs. S.J. Gaekwad, Registrar, Gujarat High Court (supra). Accordingly, Page 6 of 7 C/LPA/419/2019 ORDER the order impugned, passed by the learned single Judge deserves to be quashed and set aside.
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - A S Dave - Full Document

V.Kurein vs K. Pratap Reddy & Ors. - Opponent(S) on 11 October, 2005

In the matter of S.J.Gaekwad, Registrar (supra), proceedings were initiated by the learned single Judge on the ground that on 27th December, 2000, the learned single Judge had directed to issue a notice for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondent-Registrar; the learned single Judge had observed that in spite of directions dated 8th February, 2000, the Registrar had not taken care to apprise the Court about the action initiated by him and further proceedings; thereafter, the matter was assigned to the Court, which had the roster to hear the contempt matters for admission MCA/1979/2005 4/7 ORDER and final hearing as per the List of Sitting, commencing from 8th January, 2001 to 11th March, 2001. It is to be noted that under the High Court Rules, all the contempt matters are to be heard by a Division Bench and even in a case where the learned single Judge initiates the contempt proceedings, then too, the matter will have to be heard by a Division Bench. In cases where the learned single Judge initiates the proceedings, he himself cannot finally dispose of the proceedings in the contempt jurisdiction, the matter will have to be listed before the appropriate Bench hearing the civil or contempt matters. Paragraph-4 of the said judgement does not decide any question of law, but, simply gives details of the facts.
Gujarat High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R S Garg - Full Document

Dr. Noorjehan Safia Niaz And 1 Anr vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 6 February, 2015

10. The question whether any other Judge of the High Court can take disciplinary action against staff members of the High Court also came up for consideration before a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court in Suo Motu Vs S.J. Gaekwad, Registrar, Gujarat High Court5. In the said case, a Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court gave directions to the Registry 5 (2001) 1 GLR 752
Bombay High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - V Tehsilramani - Full Document

The vs Ahmedabad on 8 September, 2011

2 In view of the decision of this Court in the case of Suo Motu v. S.J. Gaekwad, Registrar, High Court of Gujarat, reported in 2000(1) GLR 752 and in Letters Patent Appeal No.539 of 2011 dated 6th May 2011, the aforesaid directions issued by the learned Single Judge tantamount to interference with the power of the Chief Justice under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, we set aside the following directions contained in paragraph 6 of the order dated 12th July 2011:-
Gujarat High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1