were arrayed as appellant Nos. 1 and 2 respectively,
the Vakalatnama accompanying the memorandum of appeal was signed
only by A.N. Singh ... vakalatnama had been filed on behalf of
DCC. He, therefore, rejected the request of Ram Kalewar Prasad Singh
for substitution on the following reasoning
Jaipur. Shri D.P. Chadha was in possession of
a blank vakalatnama and a blank paper, both signed by the
complainant, given ... complainant has been made to
suffer a decree for eviction. The blank vakalatnama was
used for engaging Shri Anil Sharma, advocate, on behalf
filed the petition in Court on the strength of a new vakalatnama was duly authorised; nor is it necessary to examine the oral evidence ... same day on which the compromise petition was filed. The vakalatnama contains a precis of the contents of the petition of compromise, but there
treating the 1st respondent's appeal as
competent when the vakalatnama filed on his behalf was
invalid ... respondent
suffered from an infirmity, because, the 1st respondent
signed the vakalatnama in favour of the Government Pleader.
But, since the Registry had not returned
Thali on that date i.e. on 2nd of August, 2002 filed
vakalatnamas on behalf of Respondent No.1. She also stated that the copies ... personal knowledge that her senior Mr.Thali had
filed his vakalatnama on 2nd of August, 2002 on behalf of Respondent No.1
in both
persons namely; Arun Kumar Khare and Smt. Sangita Khare filed their Vakalatnamas. After the order was passed by this Court in the Writ Petition ... 3092/2001, Arun Kumar Khare and Smt. Sangita Khare filed their Vakalatnamas through Shri Pankaj Khare, Advocate. The Vakalatnama was filed
with respect to the alleged forgery committed by them
in signing the vakalatnama. Pursuant to the direction of the High
Court, the Registrar (Judicial) lodged ... said
offences before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court along
with vakalatnama bearing the signature of appellants No.1 and 3
dated
sherista.
16. These two Pleaders and two others accepted a vakalatnama from the defendant No. 2 in a Suit ... question.
22. I cannot accept that contention. The Pleaders had accepted the vakalatnama and it is proved, in my opinion, that they were asked
statement of Rahmat Husain. He referred to the terms of the "vakalatnama" executed by the plaintiffs. Accordingly the application was dismissed on 28th ... have no force if the vakil had been authorised by his vakalatnama to take the action which he did, because, if such authority had been
that though he had filed the correct petition
along with affidavit and vakalatnama on 23.01.2019, but by mistake,
CD of another case was filed ... filed on 23.01.2019, along with copies of the affidavit and the
Vakalatnama claimed to have been signed by the authorized
representative of the petitioner
