Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (1.03 seconds)
Documents citing Chanchal Manohar Singh vs High Court Of Punjab & Haryana And Ors. on 30 September, 1996

Mehtab Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 19 February, 2021

The petitioner further states that Chanchal Singh, an accused in this FIR approached this Hon'ble High Court by way of filing CRM-M No.11262 of 2019 titled as Chanchal Singh vs. State of Punjab, with the prayer to direct the respondents - State to conclude the investigation in above FIR in a time bound manner. This Hon'ble High Court vide order dated 12.03.2019 (Annexure P-3A), directed respondent No.1 to file status report on next date of hearing. Thereafter, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub- Division Sri Hargobindpur, filed the status report dated 15.10.2019 (Annexure P-4) stating that after receiving the order dated 24.09.2010 3 of 9 ::: Downloaded on - 23-08-2021 16:36:45 ::: CRM-M-23637-2020(O&M) [4] passed by the Court of Ld. SDJM Batala, the Investigation Officer has properly indexed the cancellation report and after compliance of the above said order, the cancellation report was submitted in the Ld. Trial Court on 10.10.2019. However, vide order dated 17.01.2020 (Annexure P-5), the Ld. Trial court returned the cancellation report for further investigation. The Investigating Agency re-investigated the matter and found the allegations in the FIR false. The Station House Officer, Police Station Ghuman through application dated 05.06.2020 requested the Ld.Trial Court to approve the cancellation report. Thereafter, due to Covid pandemic, further proceedings in the Trial court could not take place.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - H S Sidhu - Full Document

State Of M.P. And Anr. vs Dr. P.K. Shrivastava And 17 Ors. on 26 February, 2001

13. Yet in another case Manohar Singh v. The State of Haryana and Ors., 1991 (1) SLR 216, High Court of Punjab & Haryana considered the question where the Engineer-in-Chief and Additional Chief Electoral Officer prior to the revision, were carrying the same pay scales; duties and responsibilities of both posts were equal, there was revision of pay scale of only of the post of Engineer-in-chief and not of Additional Chief Electoral Officer. The action was held to be discriminatory to impermissible level.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A Mishra - Full Document

Suresh Kumar Juneja vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 December, 2010

2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the State submitted that the matter was covered by the judgment of this Court dated 15.10.1993 in CWP No. 9174 of 1989 (Sangeeta Kalra v. State of haryana), wherein reference was made to earlier judgment dated 17.3.1978 of five Judges Bench of this Court in CWP No. 765 of 1978 (Krishan Chand v. The State of Haryana and others) and a judgment of Division Bench of this Court dated 10.5.1979 in CWP No. 7656 of 1991 (Manohar Singh v. The State of Haryana and others).
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Court Of Its Own Motion vs A.J. Philip, Printer, Publisher And ... on 12 January, 2003

In the case of Chanchal Manohar Singh v. High Court of Punjab & Haryana and Ors., 1998(8) Supreme Court Cases 481, indicating the caution that must be applied by the reports of different newspapers, particularly in the field of law, finding the reporter guilty of contempt still accepted the apology at it was made at the outset and on explanation was rendered for the mistake. The following observations and findings of the Apex Court can be usefully noticed at this stage:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1