citedby: 95685

Indian Bank Represented By Its ... vs R.S. Thiruvengadam And Anr. on 2 May, 1990

Similarly, Mr. Venkataraman, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant Bank argues that the judgments in Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Shri Balwant Regular Motor Service, Amravati and Ors. , cannot advance the case of the first respondent because there was no question of want of jurisdiction in that case.

Madras High Court Cites 41 - Cited by 14 - Full Document

Bhagwan Singhkanyal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 17 February, 2025

7. What was stated in this regard by Sir Barnes Peacock in Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd, PC at p. 239 was approved by this Court in Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service. Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 68 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Smt. Nidhi Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 23 August, 2024

7. What was stated in this regard by Sir Barnes Peacock in Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd, PC at p. 239 was approved by this Court in Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service. Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - S A Dharmadhikari - Full Document

Manmohan Sen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 June, 2022

7. What was stated in this regard by Sir Barnes Peacock in Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd, PC at p. 239 was approved by this Court in Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service. Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 33 - Cited by 1 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Lpa No. 24/2019 vs Baldev Singh & Anr on 27 March, 2024

18. There is a welter of precedents on delay and laches which conclude either way-as contended by both sides in the present dispute - however, the specific factual matrix compels this court to weigh in favour of the appellant-land owners. The State cannot shield itself behind the ground of delay and laches in such a situation; there cannot be a 'limitation' to doing justice. This court in a much earlier case - Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Balwant Regular Motor Service(1969) 1 SCR 808, held:

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lpa No. 24/2019 vs Baldev Singh & Anr on 27 March, 2024

18. There is a welter of precedents on delay and laches which conclude either way-as contended by both sides in the present dispute - however, the specific factual matrix compels this court to weigh in favour of the appellant-land owners. The State cannot shield itself behind the ground of delay and laches in such a situation; there cannot be a 'limitation' to doing justice. This court in a much earlier case - Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Balwant Regular Motor Service(1969) 1 SCR 808, held:

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Lpa No. 24/2019 vs Baldev Singh & Anr on 27 March, 2024

18. There is a welter of precedents on delay and laches which conclude either way-as contended by both sides in the present dispute - however, the specific factual matrix compels this court to weigh in favour of the appellant-land owners. The State cannot shield itself behind the ground of delay and laches in such a situation; there cannot be a 'limitation' to doing justice. This court in a much earlier case - Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Balwant Regular Motor Service(1969) 1 SCR 808, held:

Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 27 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Anil Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 18 November, 2024

7. What was stated in this regard by Sir Barnes Peacock in Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd , PC at p. 239 was approved by this Court in Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service . Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Ramprakash Thakur vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 21 December, 2021

M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Balwant Regular Motor Service. Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 31 - Cited by 2 - G S Ahluwalia - Full Document

Shri Jitendra Narayan Pandey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 7 February, 2025

7. What was stated in this regard by Sir Barnes Peacock in Lindsay Petroleum Co. v. Prosper Armstrong Hurd (PC at p. 239) was approved by this Court in Moon Mills Ltd. v. M.R. Meher and Maharashtra SRTC v. Shri Balwant Regular Motor Service. Sir Barnes had stated:

Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 47 - Cited by 0 - S Dwivedi - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results