Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.84 seconds)
Documents citing Dev Raj Gupta vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 2 November, 2000

U.K. Subramaniam vs Tmt.N. Meenakshi on 27 April, 2007

In (2001) 10 SCC 397 (DEV RAJ GUPTA v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS), a clerk in the office of the District and Sessions Judge got selected and appointed to the post of Clerk in the Office of Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner and subsequently he claimed that his past services should be counted towards his seniority. Such contention was repelled by the High Court. In the appeal, it was observed :-
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - P K Misra - Full Document

Dev Raj And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Others on 9 November, 2022

This order shall dispose of CWP No.37677 of 2019 (Dev Raj and others v. State of Punjab and others) and CWP No.5549 of 2020 (Harpreet 1 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 25-12-2022 18:14:11 ::: CWP No.37677 of 2019 and a connected matter [2] Singh and others v. State of Punjab and others) which are taken up together for hearing on request and with consent of learned counsel for the parties.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - L Gill - Full Document

Achuta Nand Thakur vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 November, 2010

In the case of Dev Raj Gupta Vs State of Punjab & Ors, (2001)X SCC 397 the appellant was originally appointed as a Clerk in another department in 1967 where he continued till 1976. He applied for 20 another post of Clerk in another department and on being selected got appointed on 4-1-1977. His plea for counting the length of service rendered in the earlier department for the purpose of seniority was rejected by the Apex Court in view of provisions in the relevant rules which provided that the seniority interse of the members of the services in the concerned department shall be determined by the dates of their continuous appointment in the service. In view of such statutory provisions in the Service Rules the benefit of past service was not permissible for computing seniority.
Patna High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - S K Singh - Full Document

Prakash Ranjan Kumar &Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 16 November, 2010

In the case of Dev Raj Gupta Vs State of Punjab & Ors, (2001)X SCC 397 the appellant was originally appointed as a Clerk in another department in 1967 where he continued till 1976. He applied for 20 another post of Clerk in another department and on being selected got appointed on 4-1-1977. His plea for counting the length of service rendered in the earlier department for the purpose of seniority was rejected by the Apex Court in view of provisions in the relevant rules which provided that the seniority interse of the members of the services in the concerned department shall be determined by the dates of their continuous appointment in the service. In view of such statutory provisions in the Service Rules the benefit of past service was not permissible for computing seniority.
Patna High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 3 - S K Singh - Full Document

Raksha Devi vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 19 January, 2017

Thereafter, the present petition was filed in the year 2014 stating that the same are illegal in view of the judgments of Budh Ram Versus State of Haryana and others, 2009 (3) SCT 333 FB on the basis of the judgment of the similarly situated persons in CWP No.10277 of 2010 titled as Vijay Pal Sachar and others Vs. State of Punjab and others and For Subsequent orders see RA-CW-166-2017 1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 08-07-2017 14:22:01 ::: CWP No.19002 of 2014 -2- CWP No. 10153 of 2010 titled as Dev Raj vs. State of Punjab and others, decided on 27.05.2010.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - K Singh - Full Document
1