Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (4.72 seconds)
Documents citing The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Madhu Kumari on 24 September, 2014

Kuwar Munni Devi @ Munni Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Kuwar Munni Devi @ Munni Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 12 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Raj Narayan Poddar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Arvind Kumar vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Shail Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Akhileshwar Prasad vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Pawan Kumar Jha vs The State Of Bihar on 18 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Satyadeo Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 12 April, 2026

93. The litigation subsequently moved into the stage of Letters Patent Appeals (LPAs), where the legal position Patna High Court CWJC No.17271 of 2023 dt.18-04-2026 77/134 underwent further clarification. While LPA No. 1727 of 2010 (State vs. Harishchandra Prasad) was initially dismissed on 27.07.2011, other similar and analogous appeals, such as LPA No. 566 of 2010 (State vs. Madhu Kumari) and LPA No. 200 of 2010 (State vs. Om Prakash), were heard and allowed by the Hon'ble Division Bench on 24.09.2014. These subsequent judgments effectively set aside the earlier orders of the Single Judge and reaffirmed the State's authority to act against appointments that were found to be illegal upon detailed committee scrutiny.
Patna High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document

Ramesh Kumar vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 March, 2015

20. The last submission of Mr. Sharma that the petitioner had continued for a period of nineteen years and thus his services ought to have not terminated is also not acceptable to this Court because if the petitioner had continued in service on the basis of appointment letter which was never issued by the Civil Surgeon, Gopalganj and in fact he had continued on the basis of forged appointment letter by managing to also get transferred from the jurisdiction of Civil Surgeon, Gopalganj to the jurisdiction of Civil Surgeon, Jamui, his such long continuation shall confer him with no right. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of illegal appointment of the Health Department itself in the case of Madhu Kumari (supra) had had rejected such plea of long continuation in the following terms:-
Patna High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - M K Jha - Full Document
1   2 Next