Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.42 seconds)
Documents citing Mahendra Singh Rautela vs Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas ... on 19 May, 2017

Prem Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another on 6 May, 2021

6. Besides this, the learned counsel for the petitioner has also made a reference to a judgment which was rendered by a Division Bench of this Court on 30.11.2015 in the writ petition being WPSB No.494 of 2015, "Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam", wherein almost an identical issue was involved and the Division Bench, has passed the following orders on 30.11.2015. The relevant part is quoted hereunder:-
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

Ramesh Chandra Chamoli vs State Of Uttarakhand & Another on 6 May, 2021

6. Besides this, the learned counsel for the petitioner has also made a reference to a judgment which was rendered by a Division Bench of this Court on 30.11.2015 in the writ petition being WPSB No.494 of 2015, "Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam", wherein almost an identical issue was involved and the Division Bench, has passed the following orders on 30.11.2015. The relevant part is quoted hereunder:-
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

WPSS/1603/2021 on 16 December, 2021

The petitioner's counsel further contends that the issue stands covered by the directions, which have been rendered by this Court in a writ petition, being WPSS No. 1486 of 2021, Budh Ram Vs. Uttarakhand Transport Corporation and others, which, in turn, had foundationed the judgement, on the basis of the judgement rendered by the Division Bench of this Court on 30th November 2015, as rendered in a bunch of writ petitions, with leading writ petition, being WPSB No. 494 of 2015, Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document

WPSS/1604/2021 on 16 December, 2021

Though, in relation to other department, almost an identical issue with regard to the non remittance of retiral benefits, had came up for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court and the Division Bench of this Court had accordingly, vide its judgement dated 30th May 2015, as rendered in a bunch of writ petitions with leading writ petition, being WPSB No. 494 of 2015, Lalita Prasad Tewari Vs. Uttarakhand Payjal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam had laid down certain stipulations for the time period, within which the amount of retiral benefits, under the different head as claimed by an employee, is to be remitted.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document
1