Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.39 seconds)

State Of Uttarakhand & Another ... ... vs R.P. Upadhyaya on 29 April, 2019

4. The petitioner herein raised an objection, before the Tribunal, that, since the claim petitioner's promotion as Labour Enforcement Officer was subject to the result of W.P. No. 33890 of 2000 and, since the said Writ Petition was not decided on merits, the petitioner could not claim promotion from a date from which his case was recommended for promotion by the Government of Uttar Pradesh; when the respondent-claim petitioner submitted a representation to the Labour Commissioner, Uttarakhand to review his order dated 21.2.2006, the said representation was rejected on the ground that W.P. No. 33890 of 2000 was disposed of on 26.2.2014 without any directions; and the Claim Petition was not maintainable in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in State of Uttarakhand v. Umakand Joshi, 2012 (1) UD 583, and the judgment of this High Court in Dr. Kamaljeet Singh v. State of Uttarakhand, 2018 (1) UD 337.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Dinesh Chandra Joshi And Others vs Uttarakhand And Others on 29 July, 2021

This judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 8th December, 2016, was put to challenge by the respondent employer in Special Appeal No. 371 of 2017, State of Uttarakhand and others Vs. Dinesh Chandra Joshi and others, and the Division Bench by the judgement of 8th September, 2017, had slightly modified the judgment and thereby had issued directions for consideration of the claim of the petitioner for regularization, that would be exclusively as per the Rules, and as against the sanctioned vacant posts available in the cadre.
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S K Sharma - Full Document
1