Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (0.89 seconds)
Documents citing Willian Stephen vs The State Of Tamil Nadu And Anr. on 31 October, 2023

Sudhir Kumar vs Anand Kumar on 8 May, 2024

62. It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of William Stephen Vs. State of Tamilnadu in Crl. Appeal No. 607/24 dated 21.02.2024 that Section 364A of the IPC necessitates both kidnapping and a threat to cause death and harm for conviction. In the present case, the prosecution, has not able to establish, even the ransom calls or the death threats if any, extended to the victim by the accused persons Pawan and Jagdeep at the time of kidnapping and in the present case, even the ransom calls have not been conclusive proved by the prosecution.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Deepak on 8 May, 2024

62. It has been held by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of William Stephen Vs. State of Tamilnadu in Crl. Appeal No. 607/24 dated 21.02.2024 that Section 364A of the IPC necessitates both kidnapping and a threat to cause death and harm for conviction. In the present case, the prosecution, has not able to establish, even the ransom calls or the death threats if any, extended to the victim by the accused persons Pawan and Jagdeep at the time of kidnapping and in the present case, even the ransom calls have not been conclusive proved by the prosecution.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sri Sathish Babu @ Sathish Babanna vs State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2024

11. Much emphasis is laid upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of WILLIAM STEPHEN v. STATE OF TAMIL 51 NADU - (2024) 5 SCC 258 wherein the Apex Court was considering interpretation of Section 364A of the IPC, while it would be a matter of trial for the petitioners to come out clean once cognizance is taken by the concerned Court for the relevant offences. Today, this Court is answering enlargement on bail and parameters of examination are entirely different for consideration of trial and enlargement on bail. In view of the preceding analysis, I deem it appropriate to grant these petitioners - Accused 2 to 7 the relief that they seek i.e., their enlargement on bail with certain stringent conditions.
Karnataka High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

Sri H K Sujay vs State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2024

11. Much emphasis is laid upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of WILLIAM STEPHEN v. STATE OF TAMIL 51 NADU - (2024) 5 SCC 258 wherein the Apex Court was considering interpretation of Section 364A of the IPC, while it would be a matter of trial for the petitioners to come out clean once cognizance is taken by the concerned Court for the relevant offences. Today, this Court is answering enlargement on bail and parameters of examination are entirely different for consideration of trial and enlargement on bail. In view of the preceding analysis, I deem it appropriate to grant these petitioners - Accused 2 to 7 the relief that they seek i.e., their enlargement on bail with certain stringent conditions.
Karnataka High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

K A Rajgopal vs State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2024

11. Much emphasis is laid upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of WILLIAM STEPHEN v. STATE OF TAMIL 51 NADU - (2024) 5 SCC 258 wherein the Apex Court was considering interpretation of Section 364A of the IPC, while it would be a matter of trial for the petitioners to come out clean once cognizance is taken by the concerned Court for the relevant offences. Today, this Court is answering enlargement on bail and parameters of examination are entirely different for consideration of trial and enlargement on bail. In view of the preceding analysis, I deem it appropriate to grant these petitioners - Accused 2 to 7 the relief that they seek i.e., their enlargement on bail with certain stringent conditions.
Karnataka High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document

H D Manugowda vs State Of Karnataka on 28 August, 2024

11. Much emphasis is laid upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of WILLIAM STEPHEN v. STATE OF TAMIL 51 NADU - (2024) 5 SCC 258 wherein the Apex Court was considering interpretation of Section 364A of the IPC, while it would be a matter of trial for the petitioners to come out clean once cognizance is taken by the concerned Court for the relevant offences. Today, this Court is answering enlargement on bail and parameters of examination are entirely different for consideration of trial and enlargement on bail. In view of the preceding analysis, I deem it appropriate to grant these petitioners - Accused 2 to 7 the relief that they seek i.e., their enlargement on bail with certain stringent conditions.
Karnataka High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - M Nagaprasanna - Full Document
1   2 3 Next