Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)

Usha Bai vs Yogendra Singh on 23 January, 2002

9. The learned counsel for the respondent has relied on the judgments of this Court in Divisional Engineer, Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board v. Mantobai, Widow of Lalkishan, 1990-I-LLJ-25; Madhya Pradesh Mining Corporation, Satna v. Munda Kol 1990 JLJ 413 and Gulabchand Gambhirmal v. Kudilal Govidram Seksaria, 1996 MPLJ 334. In all the above judgments, it has been held that the appeal can be entertained when it involves substantial question of law. We have found that the present appeal involves substantial question of law, therefore, the matter deserves to be considered on merits.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Managing Director, Steel Authority Of ... vs S. Chellathurai on 27 July, 2000

12. Reference has also been made to the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court in Pradesh Mining Corporation v. Munde Kol . In that case, the employer contended that workman was absent on the date of accident and that his services were terminated. I fail to understand as to how the facts of the present case could be compared with that particular case, having regard of the circumstance that in that case the employer did not produce the register, nor any officer was examined on the side of the management.
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Managing Director, Steel Authority ... vs S. Chellathurai on 27 July, 2000

12. Reference has also been made to the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court reported in Pradesh Mining Corporation v. Munde Kol, 1991 ACJ 486. In that case, the employer contended that workman was absent on the date of accident and that his services were terminated. I fail to understand as to how the facts of the present case could be compared with that particular case, having regard of the circumstance that in that case the employer did not produce the register, nor any officer was examined on the side of the management.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Managing Director, Steel Authority Of ... vs S. Chellathurai on 27 July, 2000

12. Reference has also been made to the judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court reported in Pradesh Mining Corporation v. Munde Kol . In that case, the employer contended that workman was absent on the date of accident and that his services were terminated. I fail to understand as to how the facts of the present case could be compared with that particular case, having regard of the circumstance that in that case the employer did not produce the register, nor any officer was examined on the side of the management.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1