Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)
M/S Routes Car Rentals (India) Pvt. Ltd vs M/S Reliance Capital Ltd on 5 February, 2013 cites

Madan & Co vs Wazir Jaivir Chand on 28 November, 1988

"Reliance is placed on M/s Madan and Co. Vs. Wazir jaivir Chand, AIR 1989 SCC 630, Hon'ble Supreme Court has further observed in this case that if a registered letter addressed to a person at his residential address does not get served in the normal course and is returned, it can only be attributed to the addressee's own conduct. If he is staying away for some time all that he has to do is to leave necessary instructions with the postal authorities either to detain the letters addressed to him for some time until he returns or to forward to them to the address where he has gone or to delivered them to some other person authorized by him.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 409 - S Mukharji - Full Document

Union Of India vs Popular Construction Co on 5 October, 2001

54 Thus an arbitral award can in no circumstances be challenged after the expiry of three months, extendable with the further period of thirty days if applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for making the application within these three months. 55 In light of the law laid down in "Union of India Vs Popular Construction Company" (supra) and provisions of Section 34 (3), the present petition is badly time barred and is therefore non­maintainable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 678 - R Pal - Full Document

Sona Finance Pvt. Ltd. vs Triupati Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. on 25 August, 2003

41 Petitioners have also relied on Sona Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tirpupati Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd. & Anr, 106 (2003) DLT 653, where Hon'ble High Court of Delhi held that if despite repeated efforts, the respondents were not served, the appellant could have made an application before the arbitrator or before the court for service of the respondents by publication. The said decision has been given in a matter based under the provisions of Arbitration Act 1940.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 36 - S K Mahajan - Full Document

Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs V.K. Gururaj And Ors. on 22 January, 1996

The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Chief Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. V.K. Gururaj and Ors, 1996 (7) SCC 275, held that notice sent by Registered Post, neither unserved envelopes nor AD card received back shall be deemed served. Further, it is to be pointed out that Section 3 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides three methods of delivery of communication and if any of the three methods of delivery be followed the communication would be treated as received on the date of delivery. In the light of these observations of the Apex Court, I record that the notices were served M/s Routes Car Rentals (I) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs. M/s Reliance Capital Ltd. Contd.....P....17 of 24 : 18 :
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 69 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1