Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.42 seconds)
Glorious Investment Limited vs Dunlop International Limited & Anr on 4 November, 2025 cites

Kamal Kumar Dutta & Anr vs Ruby General Hospital Ltd. & Ors on 11 August, 2006

Insofar as the other judgments cited by the respondent no.1 in support of his submissions against the maintainability of the present appeal are concerned, we notice that the judgment in the case of P.S. Sathappan (supra) cited by the respondent was duly considered by Kamal Kumar Dutta (supra) in paragraph 26 thereof and after noting several other judgments the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 100A of the Code would bar a Letters Patent appeal against an order passed by an Hon'ble Single Judge of the High Court on an appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against the order of the CLB.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 98 - A K Mathur - Full Document

Resilient Innovations Private Limited vs Phonepe Private Limited on 11 April, 2022

Resilient Innovations Pvt. Ltd. (supra) rendered by another Division Bench of Delhi High Court is distinguishable inasmuch as the same arises out of a case under Section 57 of the 1999 Act. Section 57 of the 1999 Act contemplates application for rectification filed before the Registrar or High Court. It is therefore an original proceeding and not an appellate proceeding. The same would therefore be outside the purview of the provisions of Section 100A of the Code and Letters Patent appeals thereagainst would be maintainable before the Division Bench.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1