Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.18 seconds)
Allauddin Khan vs The State Of West Bengal on 1 September, 2015 cites

Kamlesh Prabhudas Tanna & Anr vs State Of Gujarat on 26 August, 2013

Mr. Ghosh relied upon the decisions of Padam Singh vs. State of U.P., reported in (2000) 1 SCC 621, Rama vs. State of Rajasthan, reported in (2002) SCC (Cri) 829, Iqbal Abdul Samiya Malek vs. State of Gujarat, reported in (2002) SCC 312, Jeetu @ Jitendera vs. State of Chhattisgarh, reported in (2013) 11 SCC 489 and Kamlesh Prabhudas Tanna vs. State of Gujarat, reported in (2013) 15 SCC 263 in support of his above submissions.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 59 - D Misra - Full Document

State Of Rajasthan vs Smt. Kalki & Anr on 15 April, 1981

This Court again in State of Rajasthan v. Kalki held that in the depositions of witnesses there are always normal discrepancies, however, honest and truthful they may be. Such discrepancies are due to normal errors of observation, normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental disposition such as shock and horror at the time of occurrence, and the like. Material discrepancies are those which are not normal and not expected of a normal person."
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 833 - B Islam - Full Document
1