Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (1.64 seconds)

Pandit Ukha Kolhe vs The State Of Maharashtra on 11 February, 1963

23. The power of the Appellate Court to direct a re-trial in a criminal case is ordinarily exercised only in exceptional circumstances unless the Appellate Court is satisfied that the Court which conducted the trial lacked jurisdiction or that the trial was vitiated by serious illegalities or irregularities or on account of misconception of the nature of the proceedings: In effect, that there had not been any real trial at all. The justification of exceptional circumstances arises from the fact that an acquitted person is exposed to a second trial which affords the prosecutor another opportunity to rectify the infirmities disclosed in the first trial: Ukha Kolhe Vs. State of Maharashtra 1.
Supreme Court of India Cites 41 - Cited by 119 - J C Shah - Full Document

The State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Thadi Narayana on 24 July, 1961

34. The facts in The State of A.P. v. Thadi Narayana 6 substantially fits with the facts of the present case. The Supreme Court opined that the learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court acted without jurisdiction in altering the order of acquittal passed in favour of the respondent in respect of the offences under sections 302 and 392 when the learned Single Judge was dealing with the appeal preferred by the respondent against her conviction under section 411.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 44 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document
1