Puttamma W/O Lt Ramadas vs K L Narayana Reddy S/O Lt Lakshmaiah ... on 10 March, 2010
In this context, the learned counsel for the
appellant insurance company is justified in pointing out that
the case of Puttamma and others Vs. K.L. Narayan Reddy and
another (supra) concerned a claim moved on behalf of
claimants under Section 166 of the said Act i.e. under Chapter
XII thereof. The judgments on which the Tribunal also relied
were cases where the claimants had filed applications under
Section 166 of the said Act. It was while deciding the claims
under the said provision that in various judgments it was held
that the multiplier as also other factors indicated in Schedule
II had become redundant due to manifold increase in prices.