Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)
Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl.Chief Secy. ... on 3 June, 2022 cites

State Of Haryana & Anr vs Saroj Bala & Ors on 17 January, 2007

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant- Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Yadav to set-aside/ quash the charge sheet no.1 dated 21.3.2021 filed in Special Trial No.1180/2021( State Vs. Abhishek Saroj & Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 23/2021 under Sections 354, 506 IPC, Section 3(1) (Da) 3(1) (Dha), 3(2) (Va) SC/ST Act and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Fatanpur, District Pratapgarh and also to set aside/ quash the bailable warrant dated 22.2.2022 issued in Special Trial No. 1180/2021 by Special Judge/ POCSO Act, Pratapgarh.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 14 - G P Mathur - Full Document

R. P. Kapur vs The State Of Punjab on 25 March, 1960

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that the first information report of this case was lodged by the informant/ victim herself on 28.1.2021 at 9.05 p.m. at Police Station Fatanpur, District Pratapgarh stating therein that she is aged about 16 years and on 24.1.2021 at 4.00 p.m. when she had gone to cut grass in agricultural field the applicant and other co-accused persons started teasing her and also molested her and also intimidated her not to disclose the incident to any one. The informant/ victim was medically examined and she complained of pain in right forearm and abdomen. She has supported the incident in her statements. Thus in the considered opinion of this Court the material which has been placed on record reflects commission of cognizable offence by the applicant and there is nothing on record which may suggest that the investigation is either tainted or not conducted in a fair manner. Thus in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.)
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 15811 - J C Shah - Full Document

Amrawati Devi And Another vs State Of U.P. on 27 April, 2022

A seven judges Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 and Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) and in Hussain and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in MANU/SC/0274/2017 and In Re: To issue certain Guidelines Regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others, MANU/SC/0292/2021, have given various directions to criminal Courts for expeditious disposal of Bail applications. The ratio of above mentioned decisions is quite clear that, in the backdrop of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as the personal liberty of a person is at stake, the bail applications should be decided, expeditiously.
Allahabad High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 417 - S Lavania - Full Document

Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh vs State Of U.P.& Ors on 23 March, 2009

A seven judges Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 and Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) and in Hussain and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in MANU/SC/0274/2017 and In Re: To issue certain Guidelines Regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others, MANU/SC/0292/2021, have given various directions to criminal Courts for expeditious disposal of Bail applications. The ratio of above mentioned decisions is quite clear that, in the backdrop of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as the personal liberty of a person is at stake, the bail applications should be decided, expeditiously.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 9870 - Full Document

Syed Zaheer Hussain vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 4 December, 1998

A seven judges Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 and Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) and in Hussain and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in MANU/SC/0274/2017 and In Re: To issue certain Guidelines Regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others, MANU/SC/0292/2021, have given various directions to criminal Courts for expeditious disposal of Bail applications. The ratio of above mentioned decisions is quite clear that, in the backdrop of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as the personal liberty of a person is at stake, the bail applications should be decided, expeditiously.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 1846 - Full Document

In Re: To Issue Certain Guidelines ... vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 20 April, 2021

A seven judges Bench of this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 and Hon'ble Apex Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) and in Hussain and Ors. Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. reported in MANU/SC/0274/2017 and In Re: To issue certain Guidelines Regarding inadequacies and deficiencies in Criminal Trials v. State of Andhra Pradesh and others, MANU/SC/0292/2021, have given various directions to criminal Courts for expeditious disposal of Bail applications. The ratio of above mentioned decisions is quite clear that, in the backdrop of Article 21 of the Constitution of India as the personal liberty of a person is at stake, the bail applications should be decided, expeditiously.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 826 - S A Bobde - Full Document
1