using the design registration
in manufacturing the mixies.
5.Admittedly, Mrs Madhuri Mathur is the sole proprietrix
of M/s Power Control and Appliances Company ... appliances. The companies are:
(i) Power Control and Appliances (Bombay) Ltd.
(iii)Mathur Micro Motors and Appliances Ltd.
(iii)Power Control Appliances (Kandla
statement are as under
1. As per the instructions of Anil Mathur, I have paid amounts as
under: Anil Mathur, RTO, Jodhpur, Service Ratanpur ... Check
Post, Anil Mathur, Rs.600000/-, Pramod Dadhichi Rs.10,00,000/-,
Sunil Mathur, Rs.300000/-, Niharika Mathur Rs.800000/-, Malvika
Mathur Rs.300000/-, Niru
Atul Mathur, Divisional Sales Manager ... vs Atul Kalra And Anr on 8 August, 1989
Equivalent citations: 1989 SCR (3) 750, 1989 SCC (4) 514, AIRONLINE ... CRIMES 735
Author: S.R. Pandian
Bench: S.R. Pandian
PETITIONER:
ATUL MATHUR, DIVISIONAL SALES MANAGER OFJENSON AND NICHOLSON
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
ATUL KALRA
Criminal Appeal No. 643 of
1960.
R.L. Mehta, G.C. Mathur and C.P. Lal, for the appellant.
T.R. Bhasin, for the respondent ... that the investigation of the case has been made by
SubInspector Mathur, who under the law was not entitled
to investigate the case
High Court. Three separate writ petitions were filed by
Dr. H.C. Mathur, Dr. P.L. Nigam and Dr. Jagdish Narayan Rai. All
three ... April 1991 (hereinafter
referred to for the sake of convenience as 'Mathur's case'). The
High Court noted that the petitioners
Neerupam Mohan Mathur vs New India Assurance Co on 1 July, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIR 2013 SUPREME COURT ... arising out of SLP(C)No.6282 of 2011)
NEERUPAM MOHAN MATHUR …. APPELLANT
VERSUS
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. ….RESPONDENT
others filed a suit against defendant No. 1 Sh. Ganesh Narain Mathur and defendant No. 2 one Sh. Mool Chand for partition and possession ... plaintiffs claimed undivided half share with defendant No. 1 Ganesh Narain Mathur. There was also a claim for partition for other properties
Rajendra Prasad Mathur Etc vs Karnataka University & Anr on 1 May, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1986 AIR 1448, 1986 SCR (2) 912, AIR 1986 SUPREME ... Bhagwati
Bench: P.N. Bhagwati , R.S. Pathak
PETITIONER:
RAJENDRA PRASAD MATHUR ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
KARNATAKA UNIVERSITY & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT01/05/1986
came up for consideration in a writ petition
filed by Dr. Rajeev Mathur before the Rajasthan High Court.
The Rajasthan High Court held that ... prone to
vagaries and is less uncertain.
Learned advocate for Dr. Rajeev Mathur in Civil Appeal
NO. 2691/91 drew our attention to Rule
Kamal Bhasin vs Radha Krishna Mathur & Anr. on 1 November, 2017
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Bench: Vibhu Bakhru
$~71
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... 7218/2016
KAMAL BHASIN ..... Petitioner
Through: In person
versus
RADHA KRISHNA MATHUR & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra and Mr. Abhishek
Rana, Advocates
