Sudama Devi And Ors. vs Kewal Ram And Ors. on 28 November, 2007
13. Submitting in this regard, learned counsel contended that
conclusion and inferences drawn by the learned Tribunal are against facts
and evidence. A prayer is made to allow the appeal and set aside the
impugned judgment, with further prayer for grant of Rs.20 lacs to claimants,
by allowing their petition. To support his arguments, learned counsel for the
appellants has placed reliance on Ramphal vs. Baljit Singh, 2013(1) PLR
790; Sudama Devi and Other vs. Kewal Ram and Others, 2008(2) RCR
(Civil) 72; National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Sanjay Kumar and
Others, 2011(2) RCR (Civil) 242; Kusum Lata and Others vs. Satbir and
Others, 2011(3) SCC 646 and Bimla Devi and Others vs. Himachal Road
Transport Corporation and Others, 2009(13) SCC 530.