Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.03 seconds)

Shri Anil Kumar Jain And Anr. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 5 May, 2005

4. The aforesaid remaining portion of the aforesaid Land at the present moment, are being occupied and used since the year Anil Kumar Jain & Ors Vs Union of India & Ors. 5 /54 1950s by various tenants of the plaintiff i.e defendant no.4 to 6. Recently in the middle of May 1990 the defendants no. 1 to 3 with the help of their respective/agent along with Police Officials came to the disputed Land and began to demolish without any just cause the superstructures built over the aforesaid remaining portion of the said land (most Specifically shown in red Colour in the siteplan filed in this suit) and which is under the tenancies of the defendants Nos. 4 to 6. At the request of the defendants no.4 to 6 to find out the correct legal position, the defendants no.1 to 3 stopped the demolition of the superstructures built over the aforesaid land. However the defendants no.1 to 3 threatened to come again for the aforesaid purposes. No notice of whatsoever nature in respect of the aforementioned wrongful and illegal demolition has been served by the defendants no.1 to 3 either upon the plaintiffs or upon the defendants no.4 to 6. The defendants no.1 to 3 have no right, title or interest of whatsoever nature to demolish the surperstructures built over the aforesaid land and also to disturb the lawful occupation. Thus the present suit has been filed with the following prayers:
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 11 - S Kumar - Full Document

Maria Margadia Sequeria Fernandes & Ors vs Erasmo Jack De Sequeria (D) Tr.Lrs.& Ors on 21 March, 2012

27. Before parting with the judgment, this court wish to follow the Principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Maria Margadia Sequeria Fernandes & Ors vs Erasmo Jack De Anil Kumar Jain & Ors Vs Union of India & Ors. 52 /54 Sequeria (D) Tr.Lrs.& Ors decided on 21 March, 2012 observed as follows, relevant paragraphss are quoted below:
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 1056 - Full Document

Anathula Sudhakar vs P. Buchi Reddy (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 25 March, 2008

Taking guidance from above principles laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Antalula Sudhakar Vs .P. Buchi Reddy, since the present case has been filed by plaintiffs on basis of their settled possession claiming their ownership/Bhumidari rights over suit land, the maintainability of suit is was not questioned initially but defendant no.1,2 and 3 all challenged the title of plaintiff's in their WS and also throughout trial. The facts of present case falls under category (b) cases cited above as the possession is alleged by plaintiffs on basis of title in present case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 2311 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next