Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.02 seconds)
Patel Satyam Prahladbhai vs State Of Gujarat on 25 February, 2022 cites

Punjab University vs Subash Chander And Anr on 17 May, 1984

6.2 A situation akin in principle arose before the Apex Court in Punjab University Vs Subhash Chander [AIR 1984 SC 1415] wherein the student was pursuing studies of M.B.B.S. Course since 1965 and appeared in the final M.B.B.S. Examination in the year 1974. In the meantime, in the year 1970, a Regulation was amended whereby the percentage of grace marks was reduced for M.B.B.S. candidates. It was held that it was the amended Regulation which would apply in case of the petitioner as the same was in force at the time when occasion arose for the petitioner to be treated for the purpose of giving grace marks. The Supreme Court held that new Regulation as amended would apply. In the same way, there is no reason as to why equivalence prescription which is introduced in the interregnum before the petitioner is to be considered for the process of selection for interview, that she should not be denied the Page 18 of 25 Downloaded on : Fri Feb 25 22:49:55 IST 2022 C/SCA/20526/2016 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2022 candidature.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 46 - A Varadarajan - Full Document

State Of Andhra Pradesh And Ors vs Shaik Mahibulla Sharief on 22 February, 2017

32. Reliance placed on behalf of the petitioner on the decision of the Apex Court in case of State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Shaikh Mahibulla Sharief (supra)is also relevant in facts of the case wherein the Apex Court after considering that the degree issued by Page 19 of 25 Downloaded on : Fri Feb 25 22:49:55 IST 2022 C/SCA/20526/2016 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2022 Open University as equivalent to any other degree in respect of selection conducted in the year 2003 by the State of Andhra Pradesh, it was held that if Government had considered degree issued by Open University as equivalent to any other degree and permitted appointment of similarly situated persons, there is no reason why the respondent can be said to be ineligible. The Apex Court was considering A.P. Direct Recruitment for the post of Teachers (Scheme of Selection) Rules, 2012 wherein post of Language Pandit (Telugu) Grade II was to be filled in and the respondent applicant before the Apex Court was selected for said post though he was possessing B.A. with History, Economics and Political Science and B.Ed. With Telugu and Social Studies as methodology subjects in the year 2005 and candidate also passed BA in Telugu literature as a single subject from Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Open University, Hyderabad and completed MA in Telugu in distance mode. The Apex court in such facts held as under :
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - L N Rao - Full Document

Roshniben Abherajbhai Chaudhari vs Gujarat Public Service Commission & on 8 September, 2016

31. This Court (Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria) in case of Roshniben Abherajbjai Chaudhari v. Gujarat Public Service Commission and other by judgment dated 30.11.2016 in Special Civil Application Page 17 of 25 Downloaded on : Fri Feb 25 22:49:55 IST 2022 C/SCA/20526/2016 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 25/02/2022 No.13175/2016 has also following the aforesaid decision of Special Civil Application No.12204/2015 has held as under :
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 3 - N V Anjaria - Full Document
1