Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.42 seconds)
Binay Sharma @ Binay Kumar Sharma vs Ruhi Sharma on 30 June, 2025 cites

Rajnesh vs Neha on 4 November, 2020

25. Accordingly, we deem it fit and proper to remand the matter back to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur only with regard to decide the quantum of permanent alimony. The Court below is expected to direct the appellant-husband and respondent- wife to file details regarding their assets and liabilities in light of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha reported in (2021) 2 SCC 324 read with Aditi @ Mithi vs. Jitesh Sharma reported in (2023) SCC OnLine SC 1451 read with Pravin Kumar Jain vs. Anju Jain reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3678 and after analyzing their assets and liabilities, pass appropriate order Patna High Court MA No.402 of 2021 dt.30-06-2025 21/21 with regard to the permanent alimony within a period of three months from the date of passing of the judgment. Both parties are directed to co-operate in expeditious disposal of the above matter. In case of non-appearance of either party, proper order shall be passed in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 139 - Cited by 1507 - I Malhotra - Full Document

Praveen Kumar Jain vs Anjali Jain on 21 September, 2015

25. Accordingly, we deem it fit and proper to remand the matter back to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur only with regard to decide the quantum of permanent alimony. The Court below is expected to direct the appellant-husband and respondent- wife to file details regarding their assets and liabilities in light of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha reported in (2021) 2 SCC 324 read with Aditi @ Mithi vs. Jitesh Sharma reported in (2023) SCC OnLine SC 1451 read with Pravin Kumar Jain vs. Anju Jain reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3678 and after analyzing their assets and liabilities, pass appropriate order Patna High Court MA No.402 of 2021 dt.30-06-2025 21/21 with regard to the permanent alimony within a period of three months from the date of passing of the judgment. Both parties are directed to co-operate in expeditious disposal of the above matter. In case of non-appearance of either party, proper order shall be passed in accordance with law.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Jagbir Singh vs Nisha on 11 March, 2015

(iii) The Hon'ble Apex Court in "Jagbir Singh v. Nisha", (2015) 9 RCR (Civil) 873, "Rishipal v. Luxmi Devi", (2009) 4 RCR (Civil) 811, "Dharampal v. Smt. Pushpa Devi", 2004 RCR (Civil) 717, "Major Ashish Poonia Mrs. Nilima Poonia"; "Mangayakarasi v. M. Yuvaraj" (2020) 3 SCC 786, "K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa", (2013) 5 SCC 226 and "K. Srinivas v. K. Suneetha" (2014) 16 SCC 34, has held that making unfounded allegations and filing false complaints against Patna High Court MA No.402 of 2021 dt.30-06-2025 7/21 the spouse or his relatives amount to cruelty to the other spouse and held that acquittal of respondent-husband and his mother in criminal case filed by appellant in fact goes to show that respondent-husband has indeed faced matrimonial cruelties at the hands of appellant-wife.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K. Srinivas Rao vs D.A. Deepa on 22 February, 2013

(iii) The Hon'ble Apex Court in "Jagbir Singh v. Nisha", (2015) 9 RCR (Civil) 873, "Rishipal v. Luxmi Devi", (2009) 4 RCR (Civil) 811, "Dharampal v. Smt. Pushpa Devi", 2004 RCR (Civil) 717, "Major Ashish Poonia Mrs. Nilima Poonia"; "Mangayakarasi v. M. Yuvaraj" (2020) 3 SCC 786, "K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa", (2013) 5 SCC 226 and "K. Srinivas v. K. Suneetha" (2014) 16 SCC 34, has held that making unfounded allegations and filing false complaints against Patna High Court MA No.402 of 2021 dt.30-06-2025 7/21 the spouse or his relatives amount to cruelty to the other spouse and held that acquittal of respondent-husband and his mother in criminal case filed by appellant in fact goes to show that respondent-husband has indeed faced matrimonial cruelties at the hands of appellant-wife.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 677 - Full Document

Aditi Alias Mithi vs Jitesh Sharma on 31 October, 2023

25. Accordingly, we deem it fit and proper to remand the matter back to the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur only with regard to decide the quantum of permanent alimony. The Court below is expected to direct the appellant-husband and respondent- wife to file details regarding their assets and liabilities in light of Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in the case of Rajnesh vs. Neha reported in (2021) 2 SCC 324 read with Aditi @ Mithi vs. Jitesh Sharma reported in (2023) SCC OnLine SC 1451 read with Pravin Kumar Jain vs. Anju Jain reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3678 and after analyzing their assets and liabilities, pass appropriate order Patna High Court MA No.402 of 2021 dt.30-06-2025 21/21 with regard to the permanent alimony within a period of three months from the date of passing of the judgment. Both parties are directed to co-operate in expeditious disposal of the above matter. In case of non-appearance of either party, proper order shall be passed in accordance with law.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1