Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.26 seconds)

Antitrust - Section 27 Disclaimer: The ... vs Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. & Ors. ... on 25 August, 2014

The respondent No.3 has placed reliance upon 25 the judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Banerjee v. Umed Singh21, Khoday Distilleries Limited v. State of Karnataka22, P.N.Krishnalal v. State of Kerala23, S.Prakash v. K.M.Kurian24, Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank25, and Kerala Bar Hotels Association v. State of Kerala (Civil Appeal No.4157 of 2015, dated 29.12.2015), Centre for Public Interest Litigation v. Union of India (W.P. (C) No.681 of 2004, dated 22.10.2013), State of Maharastra v. Sayyed Subhan (Criminal No.1195 of 2018, dated 20.09.2018), the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in the case of Fariyaad Foundation v. Government of Jharkhand (W.P. (PIL) No.954 of 2019), the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Indore Bench in the case of Amarchand Upadhyay v. Union of India (W.P.No.10998 of 2012), the High Court of Patna in the case of Lal Babu Yadav v. the State of Bihar (WP (Civil) No.10297 of 2012, dated 10.07.2012) and the High Court of Bombay in the case of M/s.Dhariwal Industries Limited v. the State of Maharashtra (W.P.No.1631 of 2012 and other connected matters).
Competition Commission of India Cites 22 - Cited by 253 - Full Document

Antitrust - Section 27 Disclaimer: The ... vs Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. & Ors. ... on 1 October, 2014

(52) In the aforesaid case, total ban on use of tobacco in toothpaste and toothpowder was upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court even though offended the right to carry on trade guaranteed under Article 19(1) of the Constitution of India as the imposition of ban was on public interest. (53) The matter relating to imposition of restrictions on sale of pan masala containing tobacco and other tobacco products was considered by the Bombay High Court in the case of M/s.Dhariwal Industries Limited (supra). A prayer was also made to declare Regulation 2.3.4 and Regulation 3.1.7 of the Food Safety Regulations, 2011 as ultra vires and a prayer was also made for granting an interim relief. Various grounds were raised before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court for grant of stay and the Bombay High Court in paragraph 61 has held as under:-
Competition Commission of India Cites 23 - Cited by 287 - Full Document
1