Siddharth Narain Dikshit vs State Of U.P.Thr.Prin.Secy.Secondary ... on 24 August, 2021
In view of the above facts and circumstances and keeping in mind the observations/directions made by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra) and Siddharth (supra), I am of the view that until the Investigating Officer does not believe that the applicants will abscond or disobey the summons, the bail application of the applicants could not have been rejected on the sole ground that they were not in physical custody, as required under Section 439(1), Cr.P.C. Thus, the impugned order is liable to be set aside.