Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.63 seconds)

Hdfc Bank Ltd vs Sub Registrar on 1 February, 2021

5. I have considered the submissions advanced and have WP(C) NO. 8653 OF 2021 4 perused the records. Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act grants priority to secured creditors after the registration of the security interest, and the debts due to any secured creditor shall be paid in priority over all other debts, revenues, taxes, cesses and other rates payable to the Central Government or State Government or local authority. The rights and liberties conferred on the creditor/bank by virtue of mortgage created and the right to proceed under the relevant provisions of the SARFAESI Act cannot be defeated because of the subsequent attachments ordered by the Civil Court (see HDFC v. Sub Registry Officer [2011 KHC 851] and Madhan v. Sub Registrar [2014 (1) KLT 406]).
Kerala High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 6 - A Narendran - Full Document

Travancore Devaswom Board - Tdb vs Deputy Examiner For Local Fund Audit on 18 June, 2021

In TDB v Deputy Examiner, Local Fund Audit and Others, [2020 (3) KHC 129] a Division Bench of this Court had occasion to observe that the sale carried out either under the SARFAESI Act or under the RDB Act takes precedence even over the statutory charges due to the Government created under KVAT Act or under other State Enactments after the Amendment Act of 2016. A secured creditor in whose favour a security interest has been created thus has priority in sale and payment over all other statutory charge holders. In that view of the matter, the petitioner is entitled to succeed.
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 4 - P Somarajan - Full Document
1