Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)The Apprenticeship Rules, 1992
The Apprentices Act, 1961
Tikka Ram And Ors. vs The State Of Haryana, Through The Land ... on 18 August, 1997
Record reveals that the appellants and other similarly situated
candidates appeared for interview for the post of Waiters on 5.12.1999,
however, they were not selected. It is necessary to mention here that prior
to the round of litigation, referred to above, the right of the Waiters
(Trainees) for regularization, was negatived by a Division Bench of this
Court in CWP No.4374 of 1998 (Tikka Ram and others v. State of Haryana
and others) on 12.10.1998. Relevant portion of the order reads thus:-
Baljit And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 12 November, 2008
In the
order of termination, it was specifically stated that regular selection has
been made in view of order passed in Baljit Singh's case (supra). The
appellants have failed to come in the merit list, as such, they could not be
retained as Trainees anymore. The appellants were relieved from Training
with immediate effect. They came to this Court by filing CWP No.6993 of
Letters Patent Appeal No.203 of 2007 6
2002, which was disposed of vide the impugned judgment. Hence, this
appeal.
Dharambir And Others vs The State Of Haryana And Others on 19 September, 2008
All the appellants joined the respondents under the terms and
conditions stipulated in document Annexure P-2 and other similar offer
letters. It is common ground that on completion of training period, their
services were not terminated. They continued in service against fixed
amount. Several writ petitions were filed by the Waiter (Trainees) and all
those cases were disposed of in terms of an order passed in CWP No.18474
of 1996 (Dharambir and others v. State of Haryana etc.) on 1.6.1999. In
those writ petitions, the Waiter (Trainees) had claimed regular appointment
against the posts held by them. By the order, referred to above, the writ
petitions were allowed and the petitioners therein ordered to be absorbed
against the advertised posts, if they were eligible for the same. Haryana
Tourism Corporation went in appeal, which was disposed of on 30.9.1999,
with the following direction:-
1