cites: 1027370

1 - 7 of 7 (0.23 seconds)

Mohan Molla vs Baru Bibi And Anr. on 23 August, 1921 cites

Sarabai vs Rabiabai on 9 December, 1905

4. The effect of a talak by writing, as stated in Sarabai v. Rabiabai 30 B. 537 : 8.Bom. L.R. 35, is accepted by Tayabji in his Treatise on Principles of Muhammadan Law, Article 145.

Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 23 - Full Document

Furzund Hossein vs Janu Bibee And Ors. on 2 August, 1878

We observe, however, that the decision in Furzund Hossein v. Janu Bibee 4 C. 588 : 2 Shome L.R. 117 : 2 Ind. Dec. (N.S.)

Calcutta High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Asha Bibi vs Kadir Ibrahim Rowther on 3 September, 1909

Cas.740 : 36 C.184 : 13 C.W.N. 134 : 9 C.L.J. 105 and Asha Bibi v. Kadir Ibrahim Rowther 3 Ind. Cas. 730 : 33 M. 22 : 6 M.L.T.295 : 20 M.L.J. 1, where it was ruled that according to the Hanafi Law, it is not essential that the talak or words of repudiation should be addressed directly to the wife to constitute a valid divorce, and that, consequently, the absence of the wife does not make the pronouncement of talak void and inefficacious.

Madras High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 18 - Full Document