Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.57 seconds)Section 8 in Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 [Entire Act]
Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 2 in THE BIHAR FINANCE ACT, 2018 [Entire Act]
Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd vs Jayesh H. Pandya & Anr on 14 April, 2003
15, In the light of the aforesaid well-settled principles of
law and also in view of the fact that the question of payment of Entry
Tax to the Government having not been included in the arbitration
clause of the agreement in question, the case laws relied upon by
learned counsel for the respondents in case of M/s Titagarh Papers
Mills Ltd. (supra); in case of M/s Bisra Lime Stone Company Ltd.
and another (supra), in case of State of U.P. & ors. (supra), in case
of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation & Ors. (supra), as
well as in case of Ashok Kumar Choudhary (supra) are not
applicable to the facts and circumstances of the case as they are
concerned with the arbitration clauses specifically included subject
matter of the said disputes. Accordingly, the objections of the
respondents in this regard are not sustainable in law. Hence in these
circumstances, it is held that this writ petition is maintainable inspite
of the presence of an arbitration clause in the agreement between
respondents no. 1 & 2 and IJT, which is a component of the
petitioner.
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Noble Resources Ltd vs State Of Orissa & Anr on 13 September, 2006
Furthermore
only because there exists a disputed question of fact or an alternative
remedy is available, the same, by itself, would not be sufficient for
the High Court to decline to exercise its jurisdiction under Article
226 of the Constitution of India as has been held by the Apex Court
in case of Noble Resources Limited vs. State of Orissa & another,
9
reported in A.I.R. 2007 S.C. 119.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 265 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1