Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.30 seconds)Section 17 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Section 34 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
S. Balasubramanian Rep. By Power Of ... vs Land Acquisition Officer And ... on 1 March, 2001
(b) In the memorandum of grounds of appeal, the appellants have not raised any ground with regard to the validity of the judgment of the Referring Court, granting interest from the date of possession in 1983 till the date of notification in 1991. The appellants also did not seek any leave under Order 41, Rule 2, CPC. But we have taken up this issue, in view of the fact that the Referring Court had relied upon a decision of the Division Bench of this Court in S.Balasubramanian vs. Land Acquisition Officer {2001 (2) CTC 519}. But at the time when the Division Bench rendered the above decision, there were conflicting views on the issue, in three decisions of the Supreme Court viz., (i) Shree Vijay Cotton and Oil Mills (ii) Budh Singh and (iii) Mathapathi Basavannewwa.