Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.28 seconds)Section 7 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
Uttam Parkash Bansal And Ors. vs Life Insurance Corporation Of India And ... on 19 September, 2002
7.1 It may be mentioned that the Hon'ble High Court in Uttam
Prakash Bansal and Ors. Vs LIC & Ors. 100(2002) DLT 497(DB),
while dealing with the similar plea against LIC, held that the
Government Guidelines cannot override the specific provisions of
PP Act. The Hon'ble High Court, relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble
Supreme Court in AIR 1990 SC 166 and AIR 1996 SC 2710 had
observed that the Government guidelines, in view of clear statutory
provisions, would not stand as a bar to initiation of proceedings
under PP Act.
The Oriental Gas Company
Section 9 in The Public Premises (Eviction Of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 [Entire Act]
K.R.K. Talwar vs Union Of India And Ors. on 24 November, 1976
6.6 It may be mentioned that in Dr.K.R.K.Talwar vs
Union of India and another AIR 1977 Delhi 189, Hon'ble High
Court held that where the lease of a tenant is terminated or the
allotment is cancelled, the authority under which he was allowed to
occupy disappears and he becomes a person in 'unauthorized
occupation of the premises.
The Interest Act, 1978
Union Of India vs S.M. Aggarwal And 31 Ors. on 20 April, 1995
It is also a settled position of law that
the onus is upon the occupant to show his authority to occupy the
public premises after expiry of license (UOI vs S.M.Agarwal &
Ors., 1995(II) AD(Delhi) 293 (Division Bench).
H.S. Gupta vs Union Of India And Ors. on 17 September, 1982
No
obstruction due to renovation work was caused to the appellant's
business. Ld. Counsel for the respondent also submitted that the damages
are compensatory/punitive payment awarded by the court for the loss
suffered by unauthorised use of public premises and has placed reliance
upon the judgment in H.S.Gupta vs Union of India And
Others,ILR(1983) I Delhi, in support.
1