Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.20 seconds)
M.Masood Khan vs Sherin Jahan on 11 December, 2008 cites

R.V.Srinath Prasad vs Nandamuri Jayakrishna & Ors on 2 March, 2001

10. R.V.Srinath's case (cited supra) involves facts of claims between a father of the child and its grandparents. While discussing about the facts of the case, Their Lordships have also observed that when the father is facing a criminal case and that he is having an affair with another lady, cannot constitute sufficient grounds to refuse custody of the minors. In the case on hand also, it is stated that the petitioner has divorced his wife by expressing "Talaq" as per Mohomedan Law and remarried after the said divorce. As per the learned counsel for the petitioner, that cannot be valid ground to reject his claim.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 59 - D P Mohapatra - Full Document

Medai Dalavoi T. Kumaraswami Mudaliar vs Medai Dalavoi Rajammal on 30 August, 1956

14. The learned counsel for the respondent also placed reliance upon an earlier decision of the Division Bench of this Court reported in Kumaraswami Mudaliar V. Rajammal, 1957 (II) MLJ 211, wherein the learned Judges have distinguished the custody and guardianship. While they dealt with the case before them, they referred to a Division Bench decision of the Bombay High Court and held that the personal care of the mother is the paramount consideration. The relevant portion contained in that judgment is extracted below:-
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1