Mahanth Ram Charan Das vs Munshi Naurangi Lal on 17 January, 1933
Ram's case (supra) and it has been specifically held that
"Mohatmim has no power to alienate debutter property except in
case of need or for benefit of the estate."
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.46 seconds)Article 58 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 8 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 9 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953
The Himachal Pradesh Tenancy and Land Reforms Act, 1972
Smt.Urmil Gupta vs Commissioner on 21 July, 2017
13. Similar issue came up for consideration before
another Coordinate Bench of this Court (Justice Sandeep Sharma,
::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 04:31:02 :::HCHP
9
J.) in Smt. Urmil Gupta vs. Commissioner, AIR 2017 HP 183,
wherein the ratio of the judgment is in tune with that of Dhani
.
Sridhar Suar & Anr vs Shri Jagan Nath Temple & Others on 21 April, 1976
17. Hon'ble Apex Court in case titled as Sridhar Suar and
another vs. Shri Jagan Nath Temple and others, AIR 1976
SC 1860, which has also been taken note of by the
learned first appellate Court, has categorically held that it
is beyond the powers of a manager to grant a permanent
lease at a fixed rent I the absence of unavoidable
necessity; for, to fix the rent, though adequate at the time
in perpetuity, in lieu of giving the endowment the benefit
::: Downloaded on - 29/09/2019 04:31:02 :::HCHP
10
of an augmentation of a variable rent from time-to-time
would be a breach of duty on the part of the manager. It
.
Ch. Razik Ram vs Ch. Jaswant Singh Chouhan And Ors. on 11 February, 1975
In Relhu Ram vs. Than Singh and others, 1966
(LXVIII) P.L.R.866 again the Court holds:-